[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915/skl: Restructured the gen6_set_rps_thresholds function
Damien Lespiau
damien.lespiau at intel.com
Wed Feb 18 09:58:23 PST 2015
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 07:31:15PM +0530, akash.goel at intel.com wrote:
> From: Akash Goel <akash.goel at intel.com>
>
> Prior to SKL, the time period programmed in Up/Down EI & Up/Down
> threshold registers was in units of 1.28 micro seconds. But for
> SKL, the units have changed (1.333 micro seconds).
> Have generalized the implementation of gen6_set_rps_thresholds function,
> by removing the hard coding done in it as per 1.28 micro seconds.
>
> v2: Renamed the local variables & removed superfluous comments (Chris)
>
> Signed-off-by: Akash Goel <akash.goel at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 1df3fbd..78b4d62 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3643,6 +3643,8 @@ static u32 gen6_rps_limits(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 val)
> static void gen6_set_rps_thresholds(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 val)
> {
> int new_power;
> + u32 threshold_up = 0, threshold_down = 0; /* in % */
> + u32 ei_up = 0, ei_down = 0;
>
> new_power = dev_priv->rps.power;
> switch (dev_priv->rps.power) {
> @@ -3675,59 +3677,53 @@ static void gen6_set_rps_thresholds(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 val)
> switch (new_power) {
> case LOW_POWER:
> /* Upclock if more than 95% busy over 16ms */
> - I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_UP_EI, 12500);
> - I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_UP_THRESHOLD, 11800);
> + ei_up = 16000;
> + threshold_up = 95;
>
> /* Downclock if less than 85% busy over 32ms */
> - I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_DOWN_EI, 25000);
> - I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD, 21250);
> -
> - I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_CONTROL,
> - GEN6_RP_MEDIA_TURBO |
> - GEN6_RP_MEDIA_HW_NORMAL_MODE |
> - GEN6_RP_MEDIA_IS_GFX |
> - GEN6_RP_ENABLE |
> - GEN6_RP_UP_BUSY_AVG |
> - GEN6_RP_DOWN_IDLE_AVG);
> + ei_down = 32000;
> + threshold_down = 85;
> break;
>
> case BETWEEN:
> /* Upclock if more than 90% busy over 13ms */
> - I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_UP_EI, 10250);
> - I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_UP_THRESHOLD, 9225);
> + ei_up = 13000;
> + threshold_up = 90;
>
> /* Downclock if less than 75% busy over 32ms */
> - I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_DOWN_EI, 25000);
> - I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD, 18750);
> -
> - I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_CONTROL,
> - GEN6_RP_MEDIA_TURBO |
> - GEN6_RP_MEDIA_HW_NORMAL_MODE |
> - GEN6_RP_MEDIA_IS_GFX |
> - GEN6_RP_ENABLE |
> - GEN6_RP_UP_BUSY_AVG |
> - GEN6_RP_DOWN_IDLE_AVG);
> + ei_down = 32000;
> + threshold_down = 75;
> break;
>
> case HIGH_POWER:
> /* Upclock if more than 85% busy over 10ms */
> - I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_UP_EI, 8000);
> - I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_UP_THRESHOLD, 6800);
> + ei_up = 10000;
> + threshold_up = 85;
>
> /* Downclock if less than 60% busy over 32ms */
> - I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_DOWN_EI, 25000);
> - I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD, 15000);
> -
> - I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_CONTROL,
> - GEN6_RP_MEDIA_TURBO |
> - GEN6_RP_MEDIA_HW_NORMAL_MODE |
> - GEN6_RP_MEDIA_IS_GFX |
> - GEN6_RP_ENABLE |
> - GEN6_RP_UP_BUSY_AVG |
> - GEN6_RP_DOWN_IDLE_AVG);
> + ei_down = 32000;
> + threshold_down = 60;
> break;
> }
>
> + I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_UP_EI,
> + GT_INTERVAL_FROM_US(ei_up));
> + I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_UP_THRESHOLD,
> + GT_INTERVAL_FROM_US((ei_up * threshold_up / 100)));
> +
> + I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_DOWN_EI,
> + GT_INTERVAL_FROM_US(ei_down));
> + I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD,
> + GT_INTERVAL_FROM_US((ei_down * threshold_down / 100)));
> +
> + I915_WRITE(GEN6_RP_CONTROL,
> + GEN6_RP_MEDIA_TURBO |
> + GEN6_RP_MEDIA_HW_NORMAL_MODE |
> + GEN6_RP_MEDIA_IS_GFX |
> + GEN6_RP_ENABLE |
> + GEN6_RP_UP_BUSY_AVG |
> + GEN6_RP_DOWN_IDLE_AVG);
> +
> dev_priv->rps.power = new_power;
> dev_priv->rps.last_adj = 0;
> }
> --
> 1.9.2
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list