[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Add support for DRRS in intel_dp_set_m_n

Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com
Thu Feb 19 09:22:43 PST 2015


On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c at intel.com> wrote:
> Till Gen 7 we have two sets of M_N registers, but Gen 8 onwards
> we have only one M_N register set. To support DRRS on both scenarios
> a input parameter to intel_dp_set_m_n is added.
>
> In case of DRRS, When platform provides two set of M_N registers for dp,
> we can program them with two different dividers and switch between them.
> But when only one such register set is provided, we have to program
> the required divider M_N value on that registers itself.
>
> Two enum members M1_N1 and M2_N2 are defined to represent the above
> scenarios.
>
> M1_N1        :  Program dp_m_n on M1_N1 registers
>                         dp_m2_n2 on M2_N2 registers (If supported)
>
> M2_N2        :  Program dp_m2_n2 on M1_N1 registers
>                         M2_N2 registers are not supported

On a quickly first look this enum name confused me... "Why name M2_N2
when it isn't supported?!"
But than I remembered the logic behind, read again and saw it was
M2_N2 value on dp_m_n register...


>
> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |   22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 3b0fe9f..2af24a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -4322,7 +4322,7 @@ static void ironlake_crtc_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>                 intel_prepare_shared_dpll(intel_crtc);
>
>         if (intel_crtc->config->has_dp_encoder)
> -               intel_dp_set_m_n(intel_crtc);
> +               intel_dp_set_m_n(intel_crtc, M1_N1);
>
>         intel_set_pipe_timings(intel_crtc);
>
> @@ -4430,7 +4430,7 @@ static void haswell_crtc_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>                 intel_enable_shared_dpll(intel_crtc);
>
>         if (intel_crtc->config->has_dp_encoder)
> -               intel_dp_set_m_n(intel_crtc);
> +               intel_dp_set_m_n(intel_crtc, M1_N1);
>
>         intel_set_pipe_timings(intel_crtc);
>
> @@ -5044,7 +5044,7 @@ static void valleyview_crtc_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>         }
>
>         if (intel_crtc->config->has_dp_encoder)
> -               intel_dp_set_m_n(intel_crtc);
> +               intel_dp_set_m_n(intel_crtc, M1_N1);
>
>         intel_set_pipe_timings(intel_crtc);
>
> @@ -5120,7 +5120,7 @@ static void i9xx_crtc_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>         i9xx_set_pll_dividers(intel_crtc);
>
>         if (intel_crtc->config->has_dp_encoder)
> -               intel_dp_set_m_n(intel_crtc);
> +               intel_dp_set_m_n(intel_crtc, M1_N1);
>
>         intel_set_pipe_timings(intel_crtc);
>
> @@ -5895,13 +5895,29 @@ static void intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>         }
>  }
>
> -void intel_dp_set_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +void intel_dp_set_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc, enum link_m_n_set m_n)
>  {
> +       struct intel_link_m_n *dp_m_n, *dp_m2_n2 = NULL;
> +
> +       if (m_n == M1_N1) {
> +               dp_m_n = &crtc->config->dp_m_n;
> +               dp_m2_n2 = &crtc->config->dp_m2_n2;
> +       } else if (m_n == M2_N2) {
> +
> +               /*
> +                * M2_N2 registers are not supported. Hence m2_n2 divider value
> +                * needs to be programmed into M1_N1.
> +                */

.. also this good comment refreshed my memory! ;)

> +               dp_m_n = &crtc->config->dp_m2_n2;
> +       } else {
> +               DRM_ERROR("Unsupported divider value\n");
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
>         if (crtc->config->has_pch_encoder)
>                 intel_pch_transcoder_set_m_n(crtc, &crtc->config->dp_m_n);
>         else
> -               intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n(crtc, &crtc->config->dp_m_n,
> -                                                  &crtc->config->dp_m2_n2);
> +               intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n(crtc, dp_m_n, dp_m2_n2);
>  }
>
>  static void vlv_update_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 1de8e20..1fb1529 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -593,6 +593,26 @@ struct intel_hdmi {
>  struct intel_dp_mst_encoder;
>  #define DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS                0x10
>
> +/*
> + * enum link_m_n_set:
> + *     When platform provides two set of M_N registers for dp, we can
> + *     program them and switch between them incase of DRRS.
> + *     But When only one such register is provided, we have to program the
> + *     required divider value on that registers itself based on the DRRS state.
> + *
> + * M1_N1       : Program dp_m_n on M1_N1 registers
> + *                       dp_m2_n2 on M2_N2 registers (If supported)
> + *
> + * M2_N2       : Program dp_m2_n2 on M1_N1 registers
> + *                       M2_N2 registers are not supported
> + */
> +
> +enum link_m_n_set {
> +       /* Sets the m1_n1 and m2_n2 */
> +       M1_N1 = 0,
> +       M2_N2
> +};
> +
>  struct intel_dp {
>         uint32_t output_reg;
>         uint32_t aux_ch_ctl_reg;
> @@ -994,7 +1014,7 @@ void hsw_enable_pc8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  void hsw_disable_pc8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  void intel_dp_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>                       struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
> -void intel_dp_set_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> +void intel_dp_set_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc, enum link_m_n_set m_n);
>  int intel_dotclock_calculate(int link_freq, const struct intel_link_m_n *m_n);
>  void
>  ironlake_check_encoder_dotclock(const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Thanks for this change.

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>

-- 
Rodrigo Vivi
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list