[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 00/32] PPGTT dynamic page allocations and 48b addressing

[Daniel Vetter]

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 04:22:33PM +0000, Michel Thierry wrote:
> This patchset addresses comments from v5 by Mika, specially some rename changes
> touched several patches.
> 
> For GEN8, it has also been extended to work in logical ring submission (lrc)
> mode, as it will be the preferred mode of operation.
> I also tried to update the lrc code at the same time the ppgtt refactoring
> occurred, leaving only one patch that is exclusively for lrc.
> 
> I'm also now including the required patches for PPGTT with 48b addressing.
> In order expand the GPU address space, a 4th level translation is added, the
> Page Map Level 4 (PML4). This PML4 has 256 PML4 Entries (PML4E), PML4[0-255],
> each pointing to a PDP.
> 
> For now, this feature will only be available in BDW and GEN9, in LRC submission
> mode (execlists) and when i915.enable_ppgtt=3 is set.
> Also note that this expanded address space is only available for full PPGTT,
> aliasing PPGTT remains 32b.
> 
> This list can be seen in 3 parts:
> [01-10] Add page table allocation for GEN6/GEN7
> [11-20] Enable dynamic allocation in GEN8,for both legacy and
> execlist submission modes.
> [21-32] PML4 support in BDW and GEN9+.
> 
> Ben Widawsky (26):
>   drm/i915: page table abstractions
>   drm/i915: Complete page table structures
>   drm/i915: Create page table allocators
>   drm/i915: Track GEN6 page table usage
>   drm/i915: Extract context switch skip and pd load logic
>   drm/i915: Track page table reload need
>   drm/i915: Initialize all contexts
>   drm/i915: Finish gen6/7 dynamic page table allocation
>   drm/i915/bdw: Use dynamic allocation idioms on free
>   drm/i915/bdw: page directories rework allocation
>   drm/i915/bdw: pagetable allocation rework
>   drm/i915/bdw: Update pdp switch and point unused PDPs to scratch page
>   drm/i915: num_pd_pages/num_pd_entries isn't useful
>   drm/i915: Extract PPGTT param from page_directory alloc
>   drm/i915/bdw: Split out mappings
>   drm/i915/bdw: begin bitmap tracking
>   drm/i915/bdw: Dynamic page table allocations
>   drm/i915/bdw: Make pdp allocation more dynamic
>   drm/i915/bdw: Abstract PDP usage
>   drm/i915/bdw: Add dynamic page trace events
>   drm/i915/bdw: Add ppgtt info for dynamic pages
>   drm/i915/bdw: implement alloc/free for 4lvl
>   drm/i915/bdw: Add 4 level switching infrastructure
>   drm/i915/bdw: Generalize PTE writing for GEN8 PPGTT
>   drm/i915: Plumb sg_iter through va allocation ->maps
>   drm/i915: Expand error state's address width to 64b
> 
> Michel Thierry (6):
>   drm/i915: Plumb drm_device through page tables operations
>   drm/i915: Add dynamic page trace events
>   drm/i915/bdw: Support dynamic pdp updates in lrc mode
>   drm/i915/bdw: Support 64 bit PPGTT in lrc mode
>   drm/i915/bdw: Add 4 level support in insert_entries and clear_range
>   drm/i915/bdw: Flip the 48b switch

When just a few patches changed (which I suspect is the case here) please
don't resend the entire series, but only resend the individual patches
in-reply-to their earlier versions.

Resending the entire series too often tends to split up the discussions
between multiple threads, so should be used cautiously. My approach is
that I don't resend the entire series except when all the patches have
changed. And I only resend when the review round has reached a conclusion.
While the review is ongoing doing incremental updates of the series is imo
much better.

But when resending the entire series, please start a new thread. Otherwise
it again starts to become unclear which versions of which patches go
together.

And a quick aside if you fear that a patch causes subsequent patches to no
longer apply without a rebase: I can deal with a lot of small conflicts
quickly when merging. And if that doesn't cut it I'll just ask for a
resend when needed.

Just a quick reminder of patch resending bkms, intel-gfx is a really busy
place so everyone needs to strive for best signal/noise ratio.

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch