[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Add debugfs entry for DRRS
Ramalingam C
ramalingam.c at intel.com
Fri Jan 23 09:47:04 PST 2015
On Friday 23 January 2015 09:33 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:15:21PM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
>> From: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan at intel.com>
>>
>> Adding a debugfs entry to determine if DRRS is supported or not
>>
>> V2: [By Ram]: Following details about the active crtc will be filled
>> in seq-file of the debugfs
>> 1. Encoder output type
>> 2. DRRS Support on this CRTC
>> 3. DRRS current state
>> 4. Current Vrefresh
>> Format is as follows:
>>
>> CRTC 1: Output: eDP, DRRS Supported: Yes (Seamless), DRRS_State: DRRS_HIGH_RR, Vrefresh: 60
>> CRTC 2: Output: HDMI, DRRS Supported : No, VBT DRRS_type: Seamless
>> CRTC 1: Output: eDP, DRRS Supported: Yes (Seamless), DRRS_State: DRRS_LOW_RR, Vrefresh: 40
>> CRTC 2: Output: HDMI, DRRS Supported : No, VBT DRRS_type: Seamless
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
>> index 2ad4c48..47f1f65 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
>> @@ -2819,6 +2819,98 @@ static int i915_ddb_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int i915_drrs_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_info_node *node = m->private;
>> + struct drm_device *dev = node->minor->dev;
>> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> + struct i915_drrs *drrs = &dev_priv->drrs;
>> + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc;
>> + struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder;
>> + int active_crtc_cnt = 0, vrefresh = 0;
>> +
>> + for_each_intel_crtc(dev, intel_crtc) {
>> + if (intel_crtc->active) {
>> + active_crtc_cnt++;
>> + seq_puts(m, "CRTC");
>> + seq_put_decimal_ull(m, ' ', active_crtc_cnt);
>> + seq_puts(m, ": ");
>> + for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, &intel_crtc->base,
>> + intel_encoder) {
>> + /* Encoder connected on this CRTC */
>> + switch (intel_encoder->type) {
>> + case INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP:
>> + seq_puts(m, "Output: eDP, ");
>> + break;
>> + case INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI:
>> + seq_puts(m, "Output: DSI, ");
>> + break;
>> + case INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI:
>> + seq_puts(m, "Output: HDMI, ");
>> + break;
>> + case INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT:
>> + seq_puts(m, "Output: DP, ");
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + seq_puts(m, "Output: Others (id");
>> + seq_put_decimal_ull(m, '=',
>> + intel_encoder->type);
>> + seq_puts(m, "), ");
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (intel_crtc->config->has_drrs) {
>> + struct intel_panel *panel;
>> +
>> + panel = &drrs->dp->attached_connector->panel;
>> + /* DRRS Supported */
>> + seq_puts(m,
>> + "DRRS Supported: Yes (Seamless), ");
>> + if (drrs->refresh_rate_type == DRRS_HIGH_RR) {
>> + seq_puts(m,
>> + "DRRS_State: DRRS_HIGH_RR, ");
>> + vrefresh = panel->fixed_mode->vrefresh;
>> + } else if (drrs->refresh_rate_type ==
>> + DRRS_LOW_RR) {
>> + seq_puts(m,
>> + "DRRS_State: DRRS_LOW_RR, ");
>> + vrefresh =
>> + panel->downclock_mode->vrefresh;
>> + } else {
>> + seq_puts(m, "DRRS_State: Unknown");
>> + seq_put_decimal_ull(m, '(',
>> + drrs->refresh_rate_type);
>> + seq_puts(m, "), ");
>> + }
>> + seq_puts(m, "Vrefresh:");
>> + seq_put_decimal_ull(m, ' ', vrefresh);
>> +
>> + } else {
>> + /* DRRS not supported. Print the VBT parameter*/
>> + seq_puts(m, "DRRS Supported : No, ");
>> + if (dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type ==
>> + STATIC_DRRS_SUPPORT) {
>> + seq_puts(m,
>> + "VBT DRRS_type: Static");
>> + } else if (dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type ==
>> + SEAMLESS_DRRS_SUPPORT) {
>> + seq_puts(m,
>> + "VBT DRRS_type: Seamless");
>> + } else if (dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type ==
>> + DRRS_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
>> + seq_puts(m, "VBT DRRS_type: None");
>> + }
>> + }
> This is an example of were strictly following checkpatch warnings and
> pedantically breaking lines results in rather hard to read code:
> The function is really long, and has about 6 indent levels. Imo it would
> greatly benefit from extracting some helper functions to do the
> inner-level printing. There's piles of examples in i915_debugfs where we
> loop over a bunch of objects and punt all the real output to a small
> helper function.
> -Daniel
Thanks Daniel. Submitting a patch in few mins. --Ram
>> + seq_puts(m, "\n");
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!active_crtc_cnt)
>> + seq_puts(m, "No active crtc found\n");
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> struct pipe_crc_info {
>> const char *name;
>> struct drm_device *dev;
>> @@ -4433,6 +4525,7 @@ static const struct drm_info_list i915_debugfs_list[] = {
>> {"i915_dp_mst_info", i915_dp_mst_info, 0},
>> {"i915_wa_registers", i915_wa_registers, 0},
>> {"i915_ddb_info", i915_ddb_info, 0},
>> + {"i915_drrs_status", i915_drrs_status, 0},
>> };
>> #define I915_DEBUGFS_ENTRIES ARRAY_SIZE(i915_debugfs_list)
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20150123/af62fca6/attachment.html>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list