[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Per-DDI I_boost override

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Wed Jul 1 05:19:22 PDT 2015


On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 03:16:37PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:18:06PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 09:37:22AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 09:14:09AM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > > Looks good.
> > > > 
> > > > Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall at linux.intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 02:23:37PM +0300, Antti Koskipaa wrote:
> > > > > An OEM may request increased I_boost beyond the recommended values
> > > > > by specifying an I_boost value to be applied to all swing entries for
> > > > > a port. These override values are specified in VBT.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Issue: VIZ-5676
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Antti Koskipaa <antti.koskipaa at linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > What depencies has this patch? Please either mention that or include this
> > > patch in whatever other patch series it needs, since I can't apply this.
> > > Maybe it also simply needs a rebase, but conflicts don't look like that.
> > 
> > As mentioned in Antti's reply to the patch, it depends on
> > "drm/i915/skl: Buffer translation improvements".
> > 
> > Antti's patch still applies against v2 of my patch, but with some slight
> > fuzz.
> 
> Light fuzz I can handle. In the future can you pls just include Antti's
> patch when submitting yours in the same series? That way I won't miss it.

Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list