[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: FBC doesn't need struct_mutex anymore
Paulo Zanoni
przanoni at gmail.com
Thu Jul 2 15:25:13 PDT 2015
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
Everything is covered either by fbc.lock or mm.stolen_lock, and
intel_fbc.c is already responsible for grabbing the appropriate locks
when it needs them.
Reviewed-by: Chris wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 4 ----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 14 +++-----------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c | 2 --
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index b2f3919..98fd3c9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -1660,9 +1660,7 @@ static int i915_fbc_fc_get(void *data, u64 *val)
if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 7 || !HAS_FBC(dev))
return -ENODEV;
- drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
*val = dev_priv->fbc.false_color;
- drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
return 0;
}
@@ -1676,7 +1674,6 @@ static int i915_fbc_fc_set(void *data, u64 val)
if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 7 || !HAS_FBC(dev))
return -ENODEV;
- drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->fbc.lock);
reg = I915_READ(ILK_DPFC_CONTROL);
@@ -1687,7 +1684,6 @@ static int i915_fbc_fc_set(void *data, u64 val)
(reg & ~FBC_CTL_FALSE_COLOR));
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->fbc.lock);
- drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 01d7cff..83d971c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -4747,11 +4747,8 @@ static void intel_post_plane_update(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
if (crtc->atomic.update_wm_post)
intel_update_watermarks(&crtc->base);
- if (atomic->update_fbc) {
- mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ if (atomic->update_fbc)
intel_fbc_update(dev);
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
- }
if (atomic->post_enable_primary)
intel_post_enable_primary(&crtc->base);
@@ -4783,11 +4780,8 @@ static void intel_pre_plane_update(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
if (atomic->wait_for_flips)
intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips(&crtc->base);
- if (atomic->disable_fbc) {
- mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ if (atomic->disable_fbc)
intel_fbc_disable_crtc(crtc);
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
- }
if (crtc->atomic.disable_ips)
hsw_disable_ips(crtc);
@@ -11473,9 +11467,9 @@ static int intel_crtc_page_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
i915_gem_track_fb(intel_fb_obj(work->old_fb), obj,
to_intel_plane(primary)->frontbuffer_bit);
+ mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
intel_fbc_disable(dev);
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
intel_frontbuffer_flip_prepare(dev,
to_intel_plane(primary)->frontbuffer_bit);
@@ -15605,9 +15599,7 @@ void intel_modeset_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev)
intel_unregister_dsm_handler();
- mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
intel_fbc_disable(dev);
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
/* flush any delayed tasks or pending work */
flush_scheduled_work();
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
index a076c7a..cc9b7ef 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
@@ -335,7 +335,6 @@ static void intel_fbc_work_fn(struct work_struct *__work)
struct drm_device *dev = work->crtc->dev;
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
- mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->fbc.lock);
if (work == dev_priv->fbc.fbc_work) {
/* Double check that we haven't switched fb without cancelling
@@ -352,7 +351,6 @@ static void intel_fbc_work_fn(struct work_struct *__work)
dev_priv->fbc.fbc_work = NULL;
}
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->fbc.lock);
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
kfree(work);
}
--
2.1.4
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list