[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] [RFC] drm/i915: Handle HPD when it has actually occurred

Jindal, Sonika sonika.jindal at intel.com
Mon Jul 6 02:01:56 PDT 2015



On 7/6/2015 2:19 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:23:53AM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote:
>> Writing to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG for each interrupt is not required.
>> Handle it only if hpd has actually occurred like we handle other
>> interrupts.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal at intel.com>
>> ---
>> Hi,
>>
>> I see we don't check for hotplug_trigger before processing the HPD for any of the platform. Is there any reason for this?
>> For SKL, if I let write to PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG happen for all interrupts, somehow this register gets an invalid value at one point and it zeroes it out.
>> If I put this check before handling HPD, hotplug behaves fine.
>> Please let me know if you see any issue with this approach.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sonika
>>
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c |   11 ++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> index a6fbe64..2d47372 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> @@ -1760,11 +1760,12 @@ static void cpt_irq_handler(struct drm_device *dev, u32 pch_iir)
>>   	u32 dig_hotplug_reg;
>>   	u32 pin_mask, long_mask;
>>
>> -	dig_hotplug_reg = I915_READ(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG);
>> -	I915_WRITE(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG, dig_hotplug_reg);
>> -
>> -	pch_get_hpd_pins(&pin_mask, &long_mask, hotplug_trigger, dig_hotplug_reg, hpd_cpt);
>> -	intel_hpd_irq_handler(dev, pin_mask, long_mask);
>> +	if (hotplug_trigger) {
>> +		dig_hotplug_reg = I915_READ(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG);
>> +		I915_WRITE(PCH_PORT_HOTPLUG, dig_hotplug_reg);
>> +		pch_get_hpd_pins(&pin_mask, &long_mask, hotplug_trigger, dig_hotplug_reg, hpd_cpt);
>> +		intel_hpd_irq_handler(dev, pin_mask, long_mask);
>> +	}
>
> Deja vu. I think I have the same patch (also for IBX) in my stalled
> (and never posted) port A HPD branch. So yeah, I think this
> makes sense.
>
> You can also move the dig_hotplug_reg, pin_mask, and long_mask declarations
> into the if block since they're not needed elsewhere.
Sure. Do you think I should add this for ibx as well?

>
>
>>
>>   	if (pch_iir & SDE_AUDIO_POWER_MASK_CPT) {
>>   		int port = ffs((pch_iir & SDE_AUDIO_POWER_MASK_CPT) >>
>> --
>> 1.7.10.4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list