[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/18] drm/amdgpu: Don't take dev->struct_mutex in bo_force_delete

[Daniel Vetter]

It really doesn't protect anything which doesn't have other locks
already. Also this is run from driver unload code so not much need for
locks anyway.

Same changes as for readone really.

Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig at amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
index 8da64245b31b..97422bf3b7d5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
@@ -478,7 +478,6 @@ void amdgpu_bo_force_delete(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
 	}
 	dev_err(adev->dev, "Userspace still has active objects !\n");
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(bo, n, &adev->gem.objects, list) {
-		mutex_lock(&adev->ddev->struct_mutex);
 		dev_err(adev->dev, "%p %p %lu %lu force free\n",
 			&bo->gem_base, bo, (unsigned long)bo->gem_base.size,
 			*((unsigned long *)&bo->gem_base.refcount));
@@ -486,8 +485,7 @@ void amdgpu_bo_force_delete(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
 		list_del_init(&bo->list);
 		mutex_unlock(&bo->adev->gem.mutex);
 		/* this should unref the ttm bo */
-		drm_gem_object_unreference(&bo->gem_base);
-		mutex_unlock(&adev->ddev->struct_mutex);
+		drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(&bo->gem_base);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.1.4