[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Check live status before reading edid
Jindal, Sonika
sonika.jindal at intel.com
Thu Jul 9 21:31:51 PDT 2015
On 7/9/2015 10:57 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 05:34:29PM +0530, Sonika Jindal wrote:
>> Adding this for SKL onwards.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal at intel.com>
>
> I think this is the critical piece really, and I'd like to roll it out for
> all platforms. git has the code for all the old ones, so no big deal to
> digg that out. Also we need your fix for the interrupt handling first ofc,
> otherwise this won't work.
>
We have tested this with VLV/CHV too, and it works fine. I'l add those
platforms also in the next version of this patch and change the gen
check in the next patch as well.
> Then we can apply this and give it some good testing before we start
> relying on it with caching hdmi probe status. I know this means that
> things will be slower, but I've been burned a bit too much the last few
> times we've tried this. And I really think we need the most amount of
> testing we can get (hence rolling this out for all platforms). If your
> hpd irq handling bugfix is indeed the bug that will be confirmed quickly,
> otherwise it means back to debugging.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
>> index 1fb6919..769cf4f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
>> @@ -1300,6 +1300,46 @@ intel_hdmi_unset_edid(struct drm_connector *connector)
>> to_intel_connector(connector)->detect_edid = NULL;
>> }
>>
>> +static bool intel_hdmi_live_status(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
>> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
>> + enum port port = intel_dig_port->port;
>> +
>> + if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev)) {
>> + u32 temp = I915_READ(SDEISR);
>> +
>> + switch (port) {
>> + case PORT_B:
>> + return temp & SDE_PORTB_HOTPLUG_CPT;
>> +
>> + case PORT_C:
>> + return temp & SDE_PORTC_HOTPLUG_CPT;
>> +
>> + case PORT_D:
>> + return temp & SDE_PORTD_HOTPLUG_CPT;
>> +
>> + default:
>> + return false;
>> + }
>
> The old code had per-platform helper functions for this instead of a big
> if-ladder. I think that would look better.
>
Hmm, I see g4x_digital_port_connected and ibx_digital_port_connected
which already checks for these bits. We can reuse that here instead.
I'l send the next version.
Thanks,
Sonika
> Also when you digg out these old versions please also cite the commit sha1
> of the patches where we had to last revert this (and explain why it's now
> save).
> -Daniel
>
>> + } else if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
>> + u32 temp = I915_READ(GEN8_DE_PORT_ISR);
>> +
>> + switch (port) {
>> + case PORT_B:
>> + return temp & BXT_DE_PORT_HP_DDIB;
>> +
>> + case PORT_C:
>> + return temp & BXT_DE_PORT_HP_DDIC;
>> +
>> + default:
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> static bool
>> intel_hdmi_set_edid(struct drm_connector *connector)
>> {
>> @@ -1308,15 +1348,16 @@ intel_hdmi_set_edid(struct drm_connector *connector)
>> struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder =
>> &hdmi_to_dig_port(intel_hdmi)->base;
>> enum intel_display_power_domain power_domain;
>> - struct edid *edid;
>> + struct edid *edid = NULL;
>> bool connected = false;
>>
>> power_domain = intel_display_port_power_domain(intel_encoder);
>> intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, power_domain);
>>
>> - edid = drm_get_edid(connector,
>> - intel_gmbus_get_adapter(dev_priv,
>> - intel_hdmi->ddc_bus));
>> + if (intel_hdmi_live_status(hdmi_to_dig_port(intel_hdmi)))
>> + edid = drm_get_edid(connector,
>> + intel_gmbus_get_adapter(dev_priv,
>> + intel_hdmi->ddc_bus));
>>
>> intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, power_domain);
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.10.4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list