[Intel-gfx] [v3 0/7] Crystalcove (CRC) PMIC based panel and pwm control

[Shobhit Kumar]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Paul Gortmaker
<paul.gortmaker at windriver.com> wrote:
> [Re: [Intel-gfx] [v3 0/7] Crystalcove (CRC) PMIC based panel and pwm control] On 26/06/2015 (Fri 20:47) Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 06:31:37PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:32:03PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > > Next update of the series reviewed at
>> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/22/155
>> > >
>> > > Major changes are few review comments from Varka and Ville being addressed. Also except
>> > > for intel-gfx patches, all patches reviesion history is moved out of commit message.
>> > >
>> > > Hope this series finally finds its mark.
>> > >
>> > > Regards
>> > > Shobhit
>> > >
>> > > Shobhit Kumar (7):
>> > >   gpiolib: Add support for removing registered consumer lookup table
>> > >   mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Add lookup table for Panel Control as GPIO
>> > >     signal
>> > >   mfd: intel_soc_pmic_crc: Add PWM cell device for Crystalcove PMIC
>> > >   mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: ADD PWM lookup table for CRC PMIC based PWM
>> > >   pwm: crc: Add Crystalcove (CRC) PWM driver
>> > >   drm/i915: Use the CRC gpio for panel enable/disable
>> > >   drm/i915: Backlight control using CRC PMIC based PWM driver
>> >
>> > I think we have r-b/acks on all the patches now. Ok if I pull this in
>> > through drm-intel.git for 4.3? Or should I make a topic branch with tag
>> > and then send out pull requests to everyone? Or will each maintainer merge
>> > on their own since it's all only coupled at runtime anyway? Any of these
>> > would suit me.
>>
>> I forgot to mention that I had a build failure due to
>> builtin_platform_driver() when I tried this (just changed it to
>> module_platform_driver() to get past it). So I'm not sure if this
>> now depends on some tree which isn't included in -nightly...
>
> builtin_platform_register does not yet exist in mainline; as Paul (the
> other one) said earlier.  So you can either open-code what it does for
> now, or use  module_platform_register.  If you do the latter, then
> ensure you (temorarily) also include module.h or you risk additional
> breakage in the future.
>

Guess its in mainline now. Whats the plan for the merge of these patches ?

Regards
Shobhit

> Paul.
> --
>
>>
>> --
>> Ville Syrjälä
>> Intel OTC
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx