[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: Remove some unneeded checks from check_crtc_state.

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Thu Jul 16 08:01:42 PDT 2015


On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:38:33AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> Op 16-07-15 om 11:24 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:59:22AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> This is handled by the atomic core now, no need to check this for ourself.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> > For all these "Remove ..." patches I think it'd be better to rewrite the
> > changed code to use atomic state for whatever it does directly and stop
> > using any of the legacy state (whether drm core or i915 legacy state). If
> > we do that conversion it's possible to review whether there's any cases
> > we're no longer checking. Trying to do that while we just rip out code
> > makes that harder.
> >
> > hw state checker would then only compare hw state against atomic state,
> > and it would be the job of update_legacy_state and friends to make sure
> > atomic state matches up with legacy state.
> >
> I think converting the hw state checker to take atomic state would be a lot of work,
> which should really be its own followup patch series.

Yeah that's kinda my point, I'd like to split this off from at least the
dpms series. Or is connectors_active causing troubles?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list