[Intel-gfx] [RFC 06/39] drm/i915: Re-instate request->uniq because it is extremely useful

[John.C.Harrison at Intel.com]

From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>

The seqno value cannot always be used when debugging issues via trace
points. This is because it can be reset back to start, especially
during TDR type tests. Also, when the scheduler arrives the seqno is
only valid while a given request is executing on the hardware. While
the request is simply queued waiting for submission, it's seqno value
will be zero (meaning invalid).

For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h   |  5 +++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c   |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 28d51ac..a680778 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1945,6 +1945,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
 
 	bool edp_low_vswing;
 
+	uint32_t request_uniq;
+
 	/*
 	 * NOTE: This is the dri1/ums dungeon, don't add stuff here. Your patch
 	 * will be rejected. Instead look for a better place.
@@ -2186,6 +2188,9 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_request {
 	/** GEM sequence number associated with this request. */
 	uint32_t seqno;
 
+	/* Unique identifier which can be used for trace points & debug */
+	uint32_t uniq;
+
 	/** Position in the ringbuffer of the start of the request */
 	u32 head;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 2a5667b..0c407ae 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2828,7 +2828,7 @@ static void i915_fence_value_str(struct fence *fence, char *str, int size)
 
 	req = container_of(fence, typeof(*req), fence);
 
-	snprintf(str, size, "%d [%d]", req->fence.seqno, req->seqno);
+	snprintf(str, size, "%d [%d:%d]", req->fence.seqno, req->uniq, req->seqno);
 }
 
 static const struct fence_ops i915_gem_request_fops = {
@@ -2974,6 +2974,7 @@ int i915_gem_request_alloc(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
 
 	req->i915 = dev_priv;
 	req->ring = ring;
+	req->uniq = dev_priv->request_uniq++;
 	req->ctx  = ctx;
 	i915_gem_context_reference(req->ctx);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
index f455194..796c630 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
@@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_ring_sync_to,
 			     __field(u32, dev)
 			     __field(u32, sync_from)
 			     __field(u32, sync_to)
+			     __field(u32, uniq_to)
 			     __field(u32, seqno)
 			     ),
 
@@ -440,13 +441,14 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_ring_sync_to,
 			   __entry->dev = from->dev->primary->index;
 			   __entry->sync_from = from->id;
 			   __entry->sync_to = to_req->ring->id;
+			   __entry->uniq_to = to_req->uniq;
 			   __entry->seqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(req);
 			   ),
 
-	    TP_printk("dev=%u, sync-from=%u, sync-to=%u, seqno=%u",
+	    TP_printk("dev=%u, sync-from=%u, sync-to=%u, seqno=%u, to_uniq=%u",
 		      __entry->dev,
 		      __entry->sync_from, __entry->sync_to,
-		      __entry->seqno)
+		      __entry->seqno, __entry->uniq_to)
 );
 
 TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_ring_dispatch,
@@ -481,6 +483,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_ring_flush,
 	    TP_STRUCT__entry(
 			     __field(u32, dev)
 			     __field(u32, ring)
+			     __field(u32, uniq)
 			     __field(u32, invalidate)
 			     __field(u32, flush)
 			     ),
@@ -488,12 +491,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_ring_flush,
 	    TP_fast_assign(
 			   __entry->dev = req->ring->dev->primary->index;
 			   __entry->ring = req->ring->id;
+			   __entry->uniq = req->uniq;
 			   __entry->invalidate = invalidate;
 			   __entry->flush = flush;
 			   ),
 
-	    TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%x, invalidate=%04x, flush=%04x",
-		      __entry->dev, __entry->ring,
+	    TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%x, request=%u, invalidate=%04x, flush=%04x",
+		      __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->uniq,
 		      __entry->invalidate, __entry->flush)
 );
 
@@ -504,6 +508,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
 	    TP_STRUCT__entry(
 			     __field(u32, dev)
 			     __field(u32, ring)
+			     __field(u32, uniq)
 			     __field(u32, seqno)
 			     ),
 
@@ -512,11 +517,13 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
 						i915_gem_request_get_ring(req);
 			   __entry->dev = ring->dev->primary->index;
 			   __entry->ring = ring->id;
+			   __entry->uniq = req ? req->uniq : 0;
 			   __entry->seqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(req);
 			   ),
 
-	    TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, seqno=%u",
-		      __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->seqno)
+	    TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, uniq=%u, seqno=%u",
+		      __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->uniq,
+		      __entry->seqno)
 );
 
 DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_add,
@@ -564,6 +571,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_wait_begin,
 	    TP_STRUCT__entry(
 			     __field(u32, dev)
 			     __field(u32, ring)
+			     __field(u32, uniq)
 			     __field(u32, seqno)
 			     __field(bool, blocking)
 			     ),
@@ -579,13 +587,14 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_wait_begin,
 						i915_gem_request_get_ring(req);
 			   __entry->dev = ring->dev->primary->index;
 			   __entry->ring = ring->id;
+			   __entry->uniq = req ? req->uniq : 0;
 			   __entry->seqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(req);
 			   __entry->blocking =
 				     mutex_is_locked(&ring->dev->struct_mutex);
 			   ),
 
-	    TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, seqno=%u, blocking=%s",
-		      __entry->dev, __entry->ring,
+	    TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, uniq=%u, seqno=%u, blocking=%s",
+		      __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->uniq,
 		      __entry->seqno, __entry->blocking ?  "yes (NB)" : "no")
 );
 
-- 
1.9.1