[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/12] drm/i915: Convert connector checking to atomic.
Maarten Lankhorst
maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com
Tue Jul 28 08:51:41 PDT 2015
Op 28-07-15 om 15:13 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira:
> On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 14:35 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c | 2 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c | 2 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 2 -
> 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> index 5d78c1feec81..9eba3dd5b434 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> @@ -280,8 +280,6 @@ static int intel_crt_dpms(struct drm_connector *connector, int mode)
> intel_crtc_update_dpms(crtc);
> }
>
> - intel_modeset_check_state(connector->dev);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 3ab0a8a8e702..ba0b68a4209d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -6360,42 +6360,33 @@ static void intel_encoder_dpms(struct intel_encoder *encoder, int mode)
> * internal consistency). */
> static void intel_connector_check_state(struct intel_connector *connector)
> {
> + struct drm_crtc *crtc = connector->base.state->crtc;
> +
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n",
> + connector->base.base.id,
> + connector->base.name);
> +
> if (connector->get_hw_state(connector)) {
> - struct intel_encoder *encoder = connector->encoder;
> - struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> - bool encoder_enabled;
> - enum pipe pipe;
> + struct drm_encoder *encoder = &connector->encoder->base;
> + struct drm_connector_state *conn_state = connector->base.state;
>
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n",
> - connector->base.base.id,
> - connector->base.name);
> + I915_STATE_WARN(!crtc,
> + "connector enabled without attached crtc\n");
>
> - /* there is no real hw state for MST connectors */
> - if (connector->mst_port)
>
> Should the above deletion be part of the previous patch?
Huh weird, indeed..
>> + if (!crtc)
> return;
>
> - I915_STATE_WARN(connector->base.dpms == DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF,
> - "wrong connector dpms state\n");
> - I915_STATE_WARN(connector->base.encoder != &encoder->base,
> - "active connector not linked to encoder\n");
> + I915_STATE_WARN(!crtc->state->active,
> + "connector is active, but attached crtc isn't\n");
>
> - if (encoder) {
> - I915_STATE_WARN(!encoder->connectors_active,
> - "encoder->connectors_active not set\n");
>
> The converted version doesn't check connectors_active. I see it is
> later removed in the patch series, so I assume it is left out on
> purpose, but I think this is worth mentioning in the commit message.
>
>> -
> - encoder_enabled = encoder->get_hw_state(encoder, &pipe);
> - I915_STATE_WARN(!encoder_enabled, "encoder not enabled\n");
> - if (I915_STATE_WARN_ON(!encoder->base.crtc))
> - return;
>
> These are also left out. It looks like check_encoder_state() performs
> the same check, but I think the commit message should mention this if
> that's the case.
It's the case.
>> + I915_STATE_WARN(conn_state->best_encoder != encoder,
> + "atomic encoder doesn't match attached encoder\n");
>
> - crtc = encoder->base.crtc;
> -
> - I915_STATE_WARN(!crtc->state->enable,
> - "crtc not enabled\n");
> - I915_STATE_WARN(!to_intel_crtc(crtc)->active, "crtc not active\n");
> - I915_STATE_WARN(pipe != to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe,
> - "encoder active on the wrong pipe\n");
> - }
> + I915_STATE_WARN(conn_state->crtc != encoder->crtc,
> + "attached encoder crtc differs from connector crtc\n");
> + } else {
> + I915_STATE_WARN(!crtc && connector->base.state->best_encoder,
> + "best encoder set without crtc!\n");
> }
> }
>
> @@ -6444,8 +6435,6 @@ int intel_connector_dpms(struct drm_connector *connector, int mode)
> if (connector->encoder)
> intel_encoder_dpms(to_intel_encoder(connector->encoder), mode);
>
> - intel_modeset_check_state(connector->dev);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -12705,20 +12694,22 @@ static void check_wm_state(struct drm_device *dev)
> }
>
> static void
> -check_connector_state(struct drm_device *dev)
> +check_connector_state(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>
> This is called after a state swap, so I think the state variable should
> be called old_state for clarity.
Ok.
>> {
> - struct intel_connector *connector;
> + struct drm_connector_state *conn_state;
> + struct drm_connector *connector;
> + int i;
>
> - for_each_intel_connector(dev, connector) {
> - struct drm_encoder *encoder = connector->base.encoder;
> - struct drm_connector_state *state = connector->base.state;
> + for_each_connector_in_state(state, connector, conn_state, i) {
> + struct drm_encoder *encoder = connector->encoder;
> + struct drm_connector_state *state = connector->state;
>
> /* This also checks the encoder/connector hw state with the
> * ->get_hw_state callbacks. */
> - intel_connector_check_state(connector);
> + intel_connector_check_state(to_intel_connector(connector));
>
> I915_STATE_WARN(state->best_encoder != encoder,
> - "connector's staged encoder doesn't match current encoder\n");
> + "connector's atomic encoder doesn't match legacy encoder\n");
> }
> }
>
> @@ -12904,11 +12895,12 @@ check_shared_dpll_state(struct drm_device *dev)
> }
> }
>
> -void
> -intel_modeset_check_state(struct drm_device *dev)
> +static void
> +intel_modeset_check_state(struct drm_device *dev,
> + struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>
> old_state here too.
>
>
>> {
> check_wm_state(dev);
> - check_connector_state(dev);
> + check_connector_state(dev, state);
> check_encoder_state(dev);
> check_crtc_state(dev);
> check_shared_dpll_state(dev);
> @@ -13294,10 +13286,11 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev,
>
> drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_vblanks(dev, state);
> drm_atomic_helper_cleanup_planes(dev, state);
> - drm_atomic_state_free(state);
>
> if (any_ms)
> - intel_modeset_check_state(dev);
> + intel_modeset_check_state(dev, state);
> +
> + drm_atomic_state_free(state);
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 320c9e6bd848..0da4236dc85a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -999,7 +999,6 @@ int intel_connector_init(struct intel_connector *);
> struct intel_connector *intel_connector_alloc(void);
> int intel_connector_dpms(struct drm_connector *, int mode);
> bool intel_connector_get_hw_state(struct intel_connector *connector);
> -void intel_modeset_check_state(struct drm_device *dev);
> bool ibx_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct intel_digital_port *port);
> void intel_connector_attach_encoder(struct intel_connector *connector,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c
> index fd5e522abebb..600f7fb855d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c
> @@ -237,8 +237,6 @@ static int intel_dvo_dpms(struct drm_connector *connector, int mode)
> intel_crtc_update_dpms(crtc);
> }
>
> - intel_modeset_check_state(connector->dev);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> index 2c435a79d4da..8911e0e417ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> @@ -1550,8 +1550,6 @@ static int intel_sdvo_dpms(struct drm_connector *connector, int mode)
> intel_sdvo_set_active_outputs(intel_sdvo, intel_sdvo->attached_output);
> }
>
> - intel_modeset_check_state(connector->dev);
> -
>
> How does removing the checks from the _dpms() functions relate to
> converting the connector checking to atomic? If I understood correctly,
> the checks aren't necessary anymore because intel_crtc_control() is
> atomic, and that already performs a check. But if that's right this
> should be a separate patch. Or did I miss something?
>
Indeed, but there is no state left to check here, since we would have a null pointer.
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list