[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_fbc_crc: Don't force fbc on old platforms

[Daniel Vetter]

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:52:40PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2015-06-15 12:14 GMT-03:00 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>:
> > It's simply a bit too scary on pre-gen6 and imo not worth the bother
> > really until someone starts to implement all the hacks an w/a required
> > on these platforms. On later platforms the issues are just with
> > correctness and performance hence no risk for hanging machines.
> >
> > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni at gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/kms_fbc_crc.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_fbc_crc.c b/tests/kms_fbc_crc.c
> > index d9642243465c..f2a86a690767 100644
> > --- a/tests/kms_fbc_crc.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_fbc_crc.c
> > @@ -562,7 +562,8 @@ igt_main
> >                 igt_require_f(!strstr(buf, "unsupported on this chipset"),
> >                               "FBC not supported\n");
> >
> > -               igt_set_module_param_int("enable_fbc", 1);
> > +               if (intel_gen(data.devid) >= 6)
> > +                       igt_set_module_param_int("enable_fbc", 1);
> 
> I would prefer the more explicit:
> 
> igt_require_f(intel_gen(data.devid) >= 6, "Too afraid to test this.");

The problem with this is that it'll result in an unconditional skip even
on brave souls trying to test fbc on pre-gen5. Hence the explicit control
flow.
-Daniel

> igt_set_module_param_int("enable_fbc", 1);
> 
> We also need to patch kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c, but I can do this
> after your patch if you want.
> 
> >
> >                 data.bufmgr = drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_init(data.drm_fd, 4096);
> >                 igt_assert(data.bufmgr);
> > --
> > 2.1.4
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Paulo Zanoni

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch