[Intel-gfx] [RFC 02/11] drm/i915: Introduce uevent for full GPU reset.
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Tue Jun 16 09:55:02 PDT 2015
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 04:43:55PM +0100, Tomas Elf wrote:
> On 16/06/2015 14:43, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 06:03:20PM +0100, Tomas Elf wrote:
> >>The TDR ULT used to validate this patch series requires a special uevent for
> >>full GPU resets in order to distinguish between different kinds of resets.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf at intel.com>
> >
> >Why duplicate the uevent we send out from i915_reset_and_wakeup? At least
> >I can't spot what this gets us in addition to the existing one.
> >-Daniel
>
> Look at this line:
> >> + reset_event[0] = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s", "GPU RESET=0");
>
> It doesn't exist in reset_and_wakeup (specifically, the "GPU
> RESET=0" part). It's a uevent that happens at the time of the actual
> GPU reset (GDRST register write). In the subsequent TDR commit we
> add another one to the point of the actual engine reset, which also
> includes information about what exact engine was reset.
>
> The uevents in reset_and_wakeup only tell the user that an error has
> been detected and that some kind of reset has happened, these new
> uevents specify exactly what kind of reset has happened. This
> particular one on its own it's not very meaningful since there is
> only one supported form of reset at this point but once we add
> engine reset support it's useful to be able to discern the types of
> resets from each other (GPU reset, RCS engine reset, VCS engine
> reset, VCS2 engine reset, BCS engine reset, VECS engine reset).
>
> Does that make sense?
The ultimate question is how do you envisage these uevents being used?
At present, we have abrtd listening out for when to grab the
/sys/drm/cardX/error and maybe for GL robustness (though I would imagine
if they thought such events useful we would have had demands for a DRM
event on the guilty/victim fd).
Does it really make sense to send uevents for both hang, partial-reset,
and full-reset?
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list