[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Enable runtime pm

[Jesse Barnes]

On 06/16/2015 05:26 AM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2015-06-16 9:23 GMT-03:00 Paulo Zanoni <przanoni at gmail.com>:
>> 2015-06-16 5:34 GMT-03:00 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>:
>>> Can I get an ack on this please? The audio folks already move ahead
>>>
>>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.alsa.devel/139831
>>>
>>> Would be embarassing if we are late to the party we organized ourselves ...
>>
>> The situation is already embarassing for us :)
>>
>> pzanoni at nhoque:~/nfs/intel-gpu-tools/tests$ sudo ./pm_rpm --quick 2>&1
>> | tee pm_rpm.txt
>> (lots of stuff)
>> pzanoni at nhoque:~/nfs/intel-gpu-tools/tests$ ./sumario.sh pm_rpm.txt
> 
> For details, please see:
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~pzanoni/pm_rpm.txt
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~pzanoni/dmesg.txt
> 
>> Subtest drm-resources-equal: FAIL (5.897s)
>> Subtest dpms-lpsp: FAIL (10.045s)
>> Subtest dpms-non-lpsp: FAIL (10.027s)
>> Subtest cursor-dpms: FAIL (12.693s)
>> Subtest legacy-planes-dpms: FAIL (12.636s)
>> Subtest universal-planes-dpms: FAIL (12.719s)
>> Subtest dpms-mode-unset-lpsp: FAIL (12.588s)
>> Subtest dpms-mode-unset-non-lpsp: FAIL (10.234s)
>> Subtest fences-dpms: FAIL (11.726s)

Ugg...  I'd like to make sure we have bugs on these and at least some
kind of plan to fix them before enabling by default, otherwise we're
just asking for another 'disable by default' patch just before the next
release...

Jesse