[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 6/6] drm/i915/gen8: Add WaRsRestoreWithPerCtxtBb workaround
Arun Siluvery
arun.siluvery at linux.intel.com
Tue Jun 16 12:25:25 PDT 2015
In Per context w/a batch buffer,
WaRsRestoreWithPerCtxtBb
v2: This patches modifies definitions of MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM and
MI_LOAD_REGISTER_REG; Add GEN8 specific defines for these instructions
so as to not break any future users of existing definitions (Michel)
v3: Length defined in current definitions of LRM, LRR instructions is not correct.
Correct and use existing definitions and also move them out of command parser
placeholder to appropriate place.
remove unnecessary padding and follow the WA programming sequence exactly
as mentioned in spec (Dave).
Signed-off-by: Rafael Barbalho <rafael.barbalho at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 7637e64..208620d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -347,6 +347,31 @@
#define MI_INVALIDATE_BSD (1<<7)
#define MI_FLUSH_DW_USE_GTT (1<<2)
#define MI_FLUSH_DW_USE_PPGTT (0<<2)
+#define MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM MI_INSTR(0x29, 1)
+#define MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM_GEN8 MI_INSTR(0x29, 2)
+#define MI_LRM_USE_GLOBAL_GTT (1<<22)
+#define MI_LRM_ASYNC_MODE_ENABLE (1<<21)
+#define MI_LOAD_REGISTER_REG MI_INSTR(0x2A, 1)
+#define MI_ATOMIC(len) MI_INSTR(0x2F, (len-2))
+#define MI_ATOMIC_MEMORY_TYPE_GGTT (1<<22)
+#define MI_ATOMIC_INLINE_DATA (1<<18)
+#define MI_ATOMIC_CS_STALL (1<<17)
+#define MI_ATOMIC_RETURN_DATA_CTL (1<<16)
+#define MI_ATOMIC_OP_MASK(op) ((op) << 8)
+#define MI_ATOMIC_AND MI_ATOMIC_OP_MASK(0x01)
+#define MI_ATOMIC_OR MI_ATOMIC_OP_MASK(0x02)
+#define MI_ATOMIC_XOR MI_ATOMIC_OP_MASK(0x03)
+#define MI_ATOMIC_MOVE MI_ATOMIC_OP_MASK(0x04)
+#define MI_ATOMIC_INC MI_ATOMIC_OP_MASK(0x05)
+#define MI_ATOMIC_DEC MI_ATOMIC_OP_MASK(0x06)
+#define MI_ATOMIC_ADD MI_ATOMIC_OP_MASK(0x07)
+#define MI_ATOMIC_SUB MI_ATOMIC_OP_MASK(0x08)
+#define MI_ATOMIC_RSUB MI_ATOMIC_OP_MASK(0x09)
+#define MI_ATOMIC_IMAX MI_ATOMIC_OP_MASK(0x0A)
+#define MI_ATOMIC_IMIN MI_ATOMIC_OP_MASK(0x0B)
+#define MI_ATOMIC_UMAX MI_ATOMIC_OP_MASK(0x0C)
+#define MI_ATOMIC_UMIN MI_ATOMIC_OP_MASK(0x0D)
+
#define MI_BATCH_BUFFER MI_INSTR(0x30, 1)
#define MI_BATCH_NON_SECURE (1)
/* for snb/ivb/vlv this also means "batch in ppgtt" when ppgtt is enabled. */
@@ -451,8 +476,6 @@
#define MI_CLFLUSH MI_INSTR(0x27, 0)
#define MI_REPORT_PERF_COUNT MI_INSTR(0x28, 0)
#define MI_REPORT_PERF_COUNT_GGTT (1<<0)
-#define MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM MI_INSTR(0x29, 0)
-#define MI_LOAD_REGISTER_REG MI_INSTR(0x2A, 0)
#define MI_RS_STORE_DATA_IMM MI_INSTR(0x2B, 0)
#define MI_LOAD_URB_MEM MI_INSTR(0x2C, 0)
#define MI_STORE_URB_MEM MI_INSTR(0x2D, 0)
@@ -1799,6 +1822,8 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
#define GEN8_RC_SEMA_IDLE_MSG_DISABLE (1 << 12)
#define GEN8_FF_DOP_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE (1<<10)
+#define GEN8_RS_PREEMPT_STATUS 0x215C
+
/* Fuse readout registers for GT */
#define CHV_FUSE_GT (VLV_DISPLAY_BASE + 0x2168)
#define CHV_FGT_DISABLE_SS0 (1 << 10)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 27e6692..ebaba27 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1163,15 +1163,71 @@ static int gen8_init_perctx_bb(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
uint32_t index;
struct page *page;
uint32_t *cmd;
+ u32 scratch_addr;
+ unsigned long flags = 0;
page = i915_gem_object_get_page(ring->wa_ctx.obj, 0);
cmd = kmap_atomic(page);
index = offset;
+ /* Actual scratch location is at 128 bytes offset */
+ scratch_addr = ring->scratch.gtt_offset + 2*CACHELINE_BYTES;
+ scratch_addr |= PIPE_CONTROL_GLOBAL_GTT;
+
/* WaDisableCtxRestoreArbitration:bdw,chv */
cmd[index++] = MI_ARB_ON_OFF | MI_ARB_ENABLE;
+ /*
+ * As per Bspec, to workaround a known HW issue, SW must perform the
+ * below programming sequence prior to programming MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END.
+ *
+ * This is only applicable for Gen8.
+ */
+
+ /* WaRsRestoreWithPerCtxtBb:bdw,chv */
+ cmd[index++] = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1);
+ cmd[index++] = INSTPM;
+ cmd[index++] = _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(INSTPM_FORCE_ORDERING);
+
+ flags = MI_ATOMIC_MEMORY_TYPE_GGTT |
+ MI_ATOMIC_INLINE_DATA |
+ MI_ATOMIC_CS_STALL |
+ MI_ATOMIC_RETURN_DATA_CTL |
+ MI_ATOMIC_MOVE;
+
+ cmd[index++] = MI_ATOMIC(5) | flags;
+ cmd[index++] = scratch_addr;
+ cmd[index++] = 0;
+ cmd[index++] = _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(INSTPM_FORCE_ORDERING);
+ cmd[index++] = _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(INSTPM_FORCE_ORDERING);
+
+ /*
+ * BSpec says MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_REG and
+ * MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END instructions in this sequence need to be
+ * in the same cacheline. To satisfy this case even if more WA are
+ * added in future, pad current cacheline and start remaining sequence
+ * in new cacheline.
+ */
+ while (((unsigned long) (cmd + index) % CACHELINE_BYTES) != 0)
+ cmd[index++] = MI_NOOP;
+
+ cmd[index++] = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_MEM_GEN8 |
+ MI_LRM_USE_GLOBAL_GTT |
+ MI_LRM_ASYNC_MODE_ENABLE;
+ cmd[index++] = INSTPM;
+ cmd[index++] = scratch_addr;
+ cmd[index++] = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * BSpec says there should not be any commands programmed
+ * between MI_LOAD_REGISTER_REG and MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END so
+ * do not add any new commands
+ */
+ cmd[index++] = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_REG;
+ cmd[index++] = GEN8_RS_PREEMPT_STATUS;
+ cmd[index++] = GEN8_RS_PREEMPT_STATUS;
+
cmd[index++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
kunmap_atomic(cmd);
--
2.3.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list