[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Officially give up on seqno coherency
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Jun 19 09:58:52 PDT 2015
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 06:43:04PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> We've never figured out the magic trick to make irq vs. seqno
> updates coherent, only tricks to make it work. And since
>
> commit 094f9a54e35500739da185cdb78f2e92fc379458
> Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Date: Wed Sep 25 17:34:55 2013 +0100
>
> drm/i915: Fix __wait_seqno to use true infinite timeouts
>
> we automatically fall back to an irq augmented with polling scheme
> after the first missed interrupt. There's really nothing else we can
> do, hence tune down the message to informational level. It's still
> useful for users in case it reliable preceedes a hard system hang.
If I had a vote it would be DRM_NOTICE,
#define KERN_NOTICE KERN_SOH "5" /* normal but significant condition */
#define KERN_INFO KERN_SOH "6" /* informational */
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list