[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Corrected the platform checks in i915_ring_freq_table function

[Akash Goel]

On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 17:43 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:07:29PM +0530, akash.goel at intel.com wrote:
> > From: Akash Goel <akash.goel at intel.com>
> > 
> > Corrected the platform checks in i915_ring_freq_table debugfs function
> > so as to allow the read of ring frequency table for BDW and disallow for VLV
> > 
> > v2: Simplified the checks to avoid the double negation (Daniel)
> > 
> > Issue: VIZ-5144
> > Signed-off-by: Akash Goel <akash.goel at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > index c49fe2a..438c10b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > @@ -1746,7 +1746,8 @@ static int i915_ring_freq_table(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> >  	int ret = 0;
> >  	int gpu_freq, ia_freq;
> >  
> > -	if (!(IS_GEN6(dev) || IS_GEN7(dev))) {
> > +	if (!(IS_GEN6(dev) || (IS_GEN7(dev) && !IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) ||
> > +	      IS_BROADWELL(dev))) {
> 
> Still complicated and also duplicated. What about a HAS_CORE_RING_FREQ()
> feature macro, maybe even as a bitmask somewhere? We have them for rps
> too, so lots of precendence.
> -Daniel

Sincere apologies for this blooper. Messed up on my side & sent the old
patch only (with the double negation)..
Will introduce the new macro, as you suggested.

> 
> >  		seq_puts(m, "unsupported on this chipset\n");
> >  		return 0;
> >  	}
> > -- 
> > 1.9.2
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>