[Intel-gfx] Adding custom bugzilla fields

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:50:23AM +0300, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 19:05 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 06:28:39PM +0300, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > I've been looking into creating custom fields in Bugzilla to help sort
> > > our bugs in a more manageable way. I did some testing in a private
> > > installation and came up with this proposal. In a nut shell, we would
> > > add the following two fields:
> > > 
> > > 	i915 platform:	list of platforms affected by a bug;
> > > 	i915 features:  list of features affected by a bug.
> > > 
> > > Both would be multiple selection fields. The accepted values would be
> > > configured in the Bugzilla installation. The attached screenshots show
> > > how this would look like in the bug view and bug list views.
> > > 
> > > My expectation is that using those fields we could have a clearer view
> > > of which areas and/or platforms require more attention. For example, I
> > > attached a screenshot of a sample report breaking down the bugs per
> > > feature and platform. That report requires Bugzilla 5.0 (which hasn't
> > > been released yet) since prior versions didn't support reports with
> > > multiple selection fields. However, it is also possible to script a
> > > similar report, as the attached python script does. The output looks
> > > something like this:
> > > 
> > > Feature                ALL  ILK  SNB  BYT  IVB  HSW  BDW  BSW  SKL
> > > display - atomic         0    0    1    0    0    0    1    0    0
> > > display - audio          0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
> > > display - DP             0    0    1    0    1    0    1    0    0
> > > display - DP MST         0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
> > > display - DSI            0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
> > > display - eDP            0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
> > > display - fastboot       0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
> > 
> > Fastboot is very soonish no more (Maarten has patches to move it all into
> > normal modeset code). I'd drop it.
> > 
> > The other missing bit is all the plane stuff, color manager and similar.
> > Otoh this is new, so not clear yet what kind of bugs will be common. Imo
> > better to wait and then maybe add more categories.
> > 
> > > display - FBC            0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
> > > display - HDMI           0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
> > > display - IPS            0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
> > > display - LVDS           0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
> > > display - PSR            0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
> > > display - Other          0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
> > > GEM - execlists          0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
> > > GEM - PPGTT              0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
> > > GEM - Other              1    0    0    0    0    0    1    0    0
> > 
> > GEM - gpu hang
> > 
> > blows up all the time. And we need a bucket to catch all the userspace
> > hangs which are reported against the kernel.
> > 
> > > power - RC6              0    0    0    1    0    0    0    0    0
> > > power - RCS              0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
> > 
> > RPS is turbo stuff, and it's tightly coupled with rc6. Maybe instead just
> > 
> > power - GT
> > 
> > for all the GT related power saving features?
> > 
> > I'd also add
> > 
> > power - runtime PM
> > 
> > and 
> > 
> > power - suspend/resume
> > 
> > here. Tons of stuff blows up here.
> > 
> > > power - Other            0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0
> > > 
> > > 
> > > So I would like to hear what other people think about this. Specially,
> > > about what should be in the features field. The values can change
> > > overtime, but would be good to have a good list from the start. The
> > > values above are an incomplete list I threw together while looking at
> > > different open bugs.
> > 
> > Maybe we need a bit more polish, but probably not worth it to spend too
> > much time on the exact feature list. If we spot serious gaps we can always
> > add more. And remove old ones which have gone out of favour 
> 
> Here's what I got so far, after updating with your suggestions.
> 
> i915 platform:
> 
> ALL
> SKL
> BXT
> BDW
> BSW

CHV

> HSW
> IVB
> BYT

VLV

> SNB
> ILK
> I965G
> I965GM
> G45
> GM45
> PNV
> G33
> I945G
> I945GM
> I915G
> I915GM
> I865G
> I85X
> I845G
> I830

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC