[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Initialize CHV digital lock detect threshold
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue Mar 3 07:38:29 PST 2015
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:43:12PM +0530, Vijay Purushothaman wrote:
> Initialize lock detect threshold and select coarse threshold for the
> case where M2 fraction division is disabled.
>
> v2: Split the changes into multiple smaller patches based on review by
> Ville
>
> v3: Addressed rest of the review comments. Clear out the old bits before
> we modify those bits as part of RMW
>
> Signed-off-by: Vijay Purushothaman <vijay.a.purushothaman at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 8200e98..1a0f94e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -1046,6 +1046,7 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
> #define _CHV_PLL_DW9_CH0 0x8024
> #define _CHV_PLL_DW9_CH1 0x81A4
> #define DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SHIFT 1 /* 3 bits */
> +#define DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_MASK (7 << 1)
> #define DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SEL_COARSE 1 /* 1: coarse & 0 : fine */
> #define CHV_PLL_DW9(ch) _PIPE(ch, _CHV_PLL_DW9_CH0, _CHV_PLL_DW9_CH1)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 15904a8..a6b5786 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -6176,11 +6176,24 @@ static void chv_prepare_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> dpio_val |= (2 << DPIO_CHV_FEEDFWD_GAIN_SHIFT);
> vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_PLL_DW3(port), dpio_val);
>
> + /* Program digital lock detect threshold */
> + dpio_val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_PLL_DW9(port));
> + dpio_val &= ~DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_MASK;
> + dpio_val |= (0x5 << DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SHIFT);
Missing
dpio_val &= ~DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SEL_COARSE;
here.
So I think to avoid such mistakes it's best to rewrite this too as:
val = read(PLL_DW9)
val &= ~(DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_MASK | DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SEL_COARSE);
val |= 0x5 << DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SHIFT)
if (!bestm2_frac)
val |= DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SEL_COARSE;
write(PLL_DW9, val);
> + vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_PLL_DW9(port), dpio_val);
> +
> } else {
> /* M2 fraction division disable */
> dpio_val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_PLL_DW3(port));
> dpio_val &= ~DPIO_CHV_FRAC_DIV_EN;
> vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_PLL_DW3(port), dpio_val);
> +
> + /* Program digital lock detect threshold */
> + dpio_val = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_PLL_DW9(port));
> + dpio_val &= ~DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_MASK;
> + dpio_val |= (0x5 << DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SHIFT);
> + dpio_val |= DPIO_CHV_INT_LOCK_THRESHOLD_SEL_COARSE;
> + vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_PLL_DW9(port), dpio_val);
> }
>
> /* Loop filter */
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list