[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/chv: Set min freq to efficient
Hindman, Gavin
gavin.hindman at intel.com
Fri Mar 6 23:26:31 PST 2015
>On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:46:56PM +0530, deepak.s at linux.intel.com<http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx> wrote:
>> From: Deepak S <deepak.s at linux.intel.com<http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>>
>>
>> After feedback from the hardware team, now we set the GPU min freq to RPe.
>> If we drop the freq to RPn, we found that the punit was not setting the
>> voltage to Vnn, So recommendation is to set min freq to RPe.
>And does it change the voltage at all? Is there really any advantage to
>the extra code on idle? Does efficient_freq really consume less power
>than min_freq when active (assuming a min_freq/efficient_freq busy
>workload i.e. does a workload that would be 100% busy at min_freq
>consume less power when run at efficient_freq)?
>-Chris
Power team is reporting ~140mW delta at idle using efficient freq - definitely significant.
- Gavin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20150307/4dafefb8/attachment.html>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list