[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: Hide the source vs. sink rate handling from intel_dp_compute_config()
sonika
sonika.jindal at intel.com
Fri Mar 13 04:44:59 PDT 2015
On Thursday 12 March 2015 08:40 PM, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> intel_dp_compute_config() only really needs to know the rates supported
> by both source and sink, so hide the raw source and sink arrays from it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 61538f4..a88f932 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1192,9 +1192,9 @@ intel_dp_set_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> }
> }
>
> -static int intel_supported_rates(const int *source_rates, int source_len,
> - const int *sink_rates, int sink_len,
> - int *supported_rates)
> +static int intersect_rates(const int *source_rates, int source_len,
> + const int *sink_rates, int sink_len,
> + int *supported_rates)
> {
> int i = 0, j = 0, k = 0;
>
> @@ -1213,6 +1213,21 @@ static int intel_supported_rates(const int *source_rates, int source_len,
> return k;
> }
>
> +static int intel_supported_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> + int *supported_rates)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
> + const int *source_rates, *sink_rates;
> + int source_len, sink_len;
> +
> + sink_len = intel_dp_sink_rates(intel_dp, &sink_rates);
> + source_len = intel_dp_source_rates(dev, &source_rates);
> +
> + return intersect_rates(source_rates, source_len,
> + sink_rates, sink_len,
> + supported_rates);
> +}
> +
Now when I am looking at it, the name "supported_rates", sounds
confusing. Because first we are using it for sink_rates in
intel_dp->supported_rates
and then we use it to store the intersect_rates. Since sink_rates are
termed supported_rates in the spec, can we remove the sink_rates altogether
and have source_rates, sink_supported_rates and common_rates (or
something else ?)
-Sonika
> static int rate_to_index(int find, const int *rates)
> {
> int i = 0;
> @@ -1243,17 +1258,10 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> int max_clock;
> int bpp, mode_rate;
> int link_avail, link_clock;
> - const int *sink_rates;
> - int supported_rates[8] = {0};
> - const int *source_rates;
> - int source_len, sink_len, supported_len;
> -
> - sink_len = intel_dp_sink_rates(intel_dp, &sink_rates);
> -
> - source_len = intel_dp_source_rates(dev, &source_rates);
> + int supported_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES] = {};
> + int supported_len;
>
> - supported_len = intel_supported_rates(source_rates, source_len,
> - sink_rates, sink_len, supported_rates);
> + supported_len = intel_supported_rates(intel_dp, supported_rates);
>
> /* No common link rates between source and sink */
> WARN_ON(supported_len <= 0);
> @@ -1352,7 +1360,8 @@ found:
>
> if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9 && intel_dp->supported_rates[0]) {
> intel_dp->rate_select =
> - rate_to_index(supported_rates[clock], sink_rates);
> + rate_to_index(supported_rates[clock],
> + intel_dp->supported_rates);
> intel_dp->link_bw = 0;
> }
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list