[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 07/10] tests/kms_psr_sink_crc: Use pressed key to pass/fail.

[Daniel Vetter]

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 06:19:24PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> This is useful when 1 person is running all tests and other one is reading log willing
> to know what tests passed and which failed. So tester is able to run all tests without
> stop and send log to developer.
> 
> v2: Rebased after igt_debug_warn_and_wait_for_key
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c
> index 24f5ca8..ce50cdd 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c
> @@ -316,11 +316,21 @@ static bool is_green(char *crc)
>  
>  static void assert_or_manual(bool condition, const char *expected)
>  {
> -	if (igt_interactive_debug)
> -		igt_info("Is %s?\n", expected);
> -	else
> -		igt_debug("%s\n", expected);
> -	igt_debug_wait_for_keypress("manual");
> +	char msg[50];
> +	char c;
> +
> +	igt_debug("%s\n", expected);
> +
> +	sprintf(msg, "Is %s [Y/n]? ", expected);
> +	c = igt_debug_warn_and_wait_for_key("manual", msg);
> +
> +	if (c) {
> +		if (c == 'n' || c == 'N')
> +			igt_fail(-1);
> +		else
> +			igt_info("\n");
> +	}

Imo it'd be better to move this check into the helper too. And then give
it a name that makes it clear that it's a checkpoint for the user for
manual testing. I don't have any good ideas, but maybe
igt_interactive_debug_manual_check?

And imo you can fold this one in with the previous patch - easier to
understand if you add the user together with the function.

And one more aside: Should we document the different interactive debug
thigns somewhere?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch