[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] igt/gem_concurrent_blit: Exercise concurrent reads
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Mar 16 07:35:25 PDT 2015
Since we are considering implementing read-read optimisations for mixed
engine workloads, make sure that we at least have a few tests that check
for coherency when doing so.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
tests/gem_concurrent_blit.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/gem_concurrent_blit.c b/tests/gem_concurrent_blit.c
index 782e387..2a40060 100644
--- a/tests/gem_concurrent_blit.c
+++ b/tests/gem_concurrent_blit.c
@@ -372,7 +372,8 @@ igt_render_copyfunc_t rendercopy;
struct buffers {
const struct access_mode *mode;
drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr;
- drm_intel_bo *src[MAX_NUM_BUFFERS], *dst[MAX_NUM_BUFFERS], *dummy;
+ drm_intel_bo *src[MAX_NUM_BUFFERS], *dst[MAX_NUM_BUFFERS];
+ drm_intel_bo *dummy, *spare;
int count;
};
@@ -400,6 +401,7 @@ static void buffers_destroy(struct buffers *data)
data->mode->release_bo(data->dst[i]);
}
data->mode->release_bo(data->dummy);
+ data->mode->release_bo(data->spare);
data->count = 0;
}
@@ -417,6 +419,7 @@ static void buffers_create(struct buffers *data,
data->mode->create_bo(data->bufmgr, width, height);
}
data->dummy = data->mode->create_bo(data->bufmgr, width, height);
+ data->spare = data->mode->create_bo(data->bufmgr, width, height);
data->count = count;
}
@@ -621,6 +624,48 @@ static void do_early_read(struct buffers *buffers,
igt_post_hang_ring(fd, hang);
}
+static void do_read_read_bcs(struct buffers *buffers,
+ do_copy do_copy_func,
+ do_hang do_hang_func)
+{
+ struct igt_hang_ring hang;
+ int i;
+
+ gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
+ for (i = buffers->count; i--; )
+ buffers->mode->set_bo(buffers->src[i], 0xdeadbeef ^ i, width, height);
+ for (i = 0; i < buffers->count; i++) {
+ do_copy_func(buffers->dst[i], buffers->src[i]);
+ blt_copy_bo(buffers->spare, buffers->src[i]);
+ }
+ cpu_cmp_bo(buffers->spare, 0xdeadbeef^(buffers->count-1), width, height, NULL);
+ hang = do_hang_func();
+ for (i = buffers->count; i--; )
+ buffers->mode->cmp_bo(buffers->dst[i], 0xdeadbeef ^ i, width, height, buffers->dummy);
+ igt_post_hang_ring(fd, hang);
+}
+
+static void do_read_read_rcs(struct buffers *buffers,
+ do_copy do_copy_func,
+ do_hang do_hang_func)
+{
+ struct igt_hang_ring hang;
+ int i;
+
+ gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
+ for (i = buffers->count; i--; )
+ buffers->mode->set_bo(buffers->src[i], 0xdeadbeef ^ i, width, height);
+ for (i = 0; i < buffers->count; i++) {
+ do_copy_func(buffers->dst[i], buffers->src[i]);
+ render_copy_bo(buffers->spare, buffers->src[i]);
+ }
+ cpu_cmp_bo(buffers->spare, 0xdeadbeef^(buffers->count-1), width, height, NULL);
+ hang = do_hang_func();
+ for (i = buffers->count; i--; )
+ buffers->mode->cmp_bo(buffers->dst[i], 0xdeadbeef ^ i, width, height, buffers->dummy);
+ igt_post_hang_ring(fd, hang);
+}
+
static void do_gpu_read_after_write(struct buffers *buffers,
do_copy do_copy_func,
do_hang do_hang_func)
@@ -817,6 +862,24 @@ run_basic_modes(const struct access_mode *mode,
p->copy, h->hang);
}
+ /* concurrent reads */
+ igt_subtest_f("%s-%s-read-read-bcs%s%s", mode->name, p->prefix, suffix, h->suffix) {
+ h->require();
+ p->require();
+ buffers_create(&buffers, num_buffers);
+ run_wrap_func(&buffers,
+ do_read_read_bcs,
+ p->copy, h->hang);
+ }
+ igt_subtest_f("%s-%s-read-read-rcs%s%s", mode->name, p->prefix, suffix, h->suffix) {
+ h->require();
+ p->require();
+ buffers_create(&buffers, num_buffers);
+ run_wrap_func(&buffers,
+ do_read_read_rcs,
+ p->copy, h->hang);
+ }
+
/* and finally try to trick the kernel into loosing the pending write */
igt_subtest_f("%s-%s-gpu-read-after-write%s%s", mode->name, p->prefix, suffix, h->suffix) {
h->require();
--
2.1.4
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list