[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i195/bxt: Add A1 stepping for Broxton

[He, Shuang]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesse Barnes [mailto:jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org]
> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 3:17 AM
> To: He, Shuang; Gao, Ethan; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Hoath, Nicholas
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i195/bxt: Add A1 stepping for Broxton
> 
> On 03/20/2015 10:14 AM, shuang.he at intel.com wrote:
> > Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
> shuang.he at intel.com)
> > Task id: 6016
> > -------------------------------------Summary-------------------------------------
> > Platform          Delta          drm-intel-nightly          Series Applied
> > PNV                 -2              274/274              272/274
> > ILK                                  303/303              303/303
> > SNB                                  303/303              303/303
> > IVB                 -2              342/342              340/342
> > BYT                                  287/287              287/287
> > HSW                                  362/362              362/362
> > BDW                                  308/308              308/308
> > -------------------------------------Detailed-------------------------------------
> > Platform  Test                                drm-intel-nightly          Series Applied
> > *PNV  igt_gem_userptr_blits_minor-sync-interruptible      PASS(2)
> DMESG_WARN(1)PASS(1)
> > *PNV  igt_gen3_render_linear_blits      PASS(3)      CRASH(1)PASS(1)
> >  IVB  igt_gem_pwrite_pread_snooped-copy-performance
> DMESG_WARN(1)PASS(3)      DMESG_WARN(1)PASS(1)
> > *IVB  igt_gem_storedw_batches_loop_secure-dispatch      PASS(3)
> DMESG_WARN(1)PASS(1)
> > Note: You need to pay more attention to line start with '*'
> 
> I wonder what these warnings actually are... I've been seeing the
> userptr_blits tests on PNV trigger warnings in a lot of PRTS results
> lately, and it must be intermittent since this patch would have no
> effect on PNV.
> 
> Shuang, when do you think you'll be able to attach the dmesg snippets
> from failures like these to the  msgs?  Would make things easier to
> triage at least.
[He, Shuang] yeah, it makes sense, we will see how we can improve this

> 
> And do we have a bug open?  I don't see this particular issue listed in
> the igt failures at bugs.fdo, but it could be a dupe with some other
> warning there.
[He, Shuang] I'll forward this to QA guys working on kernel validation, see if they already have this tracked

Thanks
	--Shuang
> 
> Thanks,
> Jesse