[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: eDP Panel Power sequencing
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Wed May 6 08:05:44 PDT 2015
On Mon, 04 May 2015, Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan at intel.com> wrote:
> Changes based on future platform readiness patches related to
> HAS_PCH_SPLIT(). Use HAS_GMCH_DISPLAY() instead of HAS_PCH_SPLIT.
This needs an update to reflect the patch.
> BXT does not have PP_DIV register. Making changes to handle this.
> Second set of PPS registers have been defined but will be used when VBT
> provides a selection between the 2 sets of registers.
>
> v2:
> [Jani] Added 2nd set of PPS registers and the macro
> Jani's review comments
> - remove reference in i915_suspend.c
> - Use BXT PP macro
> Squashing all PPS related patches into one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: A.Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 13 ++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 36805b6..e8d93ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -6315,6 +6315,8 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
> #define PCH_PP_CONTROL 0xc7204
> #define PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS (0xabcd << 16)
> #define PANEL_UNLOCK_MASK (0xffff << 16)
> +#define BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK (0x1f0)
> +#define BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT 4
> #define EDP_FORCE_VDD (1 << 3)
> #define EDP_BLC_ENABLE (1 << 2)
> #define PANEL_POWER_RESET (1 << 1)
> @@ -6343,6 +6345,17 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
> #define PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK (0x1f)
> #define PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT 0
>
> +/* BXT PPS changes - 2nd set of PPS registers */
> +#define _BXT_PP_STATUS2 0xc7300
> +#define _BXT_PP_CONTROL2 0xc7304
> +#define _BXT_PP_ON_DELAYS2 0xc7308
> +#define _BXT_PP_OFF_DELAYS2 0xc730c
> +
> +#define BXT_PP_STATUS(n) ((!n) ? PCH_PP_STATUS : _BXT_PP_STATUS2)
> +#define BXT_PP_CONTROL(n) ((!n) ? PCH_PP_CONTROL : _BXT_PP_CONTROL2)
> +#define BXT_PP_ON_DELAYS(n) ((!n) ? PCH_PP_ON_DELAYS : _BXT_PP_ON_DELAYS2)
> +#define BXT_PP_OFF_DELAYS(n) ((!n) ? PCH_PP_OFF_DELAYS : _BXT_PP_OFF_DELAYS2)
> +
> #define PCH_DP_B 0xe4100
> #define PCH_DPB_AUX_CH_CTL 0xe4110
> #define PCH_DPB_AUX_CH_DATA1 0xe4114
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 937ba31..fd91006 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -559,7 +559,9 @@ static u32 _pp_ctrl_reg(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
>
> - if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev))
> + if (IS_BROXTON(dev))
> + return BXT_PP_CONTROL(0);
> + else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev))
> return PCH_PP_CONTROL;
> else
> return VLV_PIPE_PP_CONTROL(vlv_power_sequencer_pipe(intel_dp));
> @@ -569,7 +571,9 @@ static u32 _pp_stat_reg(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
>
> - if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev))
> + if (IS_BROXTON(dev))
> + return BXT_PP_STATUS(0);
> + else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev))
> return PCH_PP_STATUS;
> else
> return VLV_PIPE_PP_STATUS(vlv_power_sequencer_pipe(intel_dp));
> @@ -4954,8 +4958,8 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct drm_device *dev,
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> struct edp_power_seq cur, vbt, spec,
> *final = &intel_dp->pps_delays;
> - u32 pp_on, pp_off, pp_div, pp;
> - int pp_ctrl_reg, pp_on_reg, pp_off_reg, pp_div_reg;
> + u32 pp_on, pp_off, pp_div = 0, pp_ctl = 0, pp;
> + int pp_ctrl_reg, pp_on_reg, pp_off_reg, pp_div_reg = 0;
Note that pp is actually used for pp_ctl. You can rename that if you
want.
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->pps_mutex);
>
> @@ -4963,7 +4967,16 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct drm_device *dev,
> if (final->t11_t12 != 0)
> return;
>
> - if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
> + if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
> + /*
> + * TODO: BXT has 2 sets of PPS registers.
> + * Correct Register for Broxton need to be identified
> + * using VBT. hardcoding for now
> + */
> + pp_ctrl_reg = BXT_PP_CONTROL(0);
> + pp_on_reg = BXT_PP_ON_DELAYS(0);
> + pp_off_reg = BXT_PP_OFF_DELAYS(0);
> + } else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
> pp_ctrl_reg = PCH_PP_CONTROL;
> pp_on_reg = PCH_PP_ON_DELAYS;
> pp_off_reg = PCH_PP_OFF_DELAYS;
> @@ -4984,7 +4997,10 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct drm_device *dev,
>
> pp_on = I915_READ(pp_on_reg);
> pp_off = I915_READ(pp_off_reg);
> - pp_div = I915_READ(pp_div_reg);
> + if (!IS_BROXTON(dev))
> + pp_div = I915_READ(pp_div_reg);
> + else
> + pp_ctl = I915_READ(pp_ctrl_reg);
You already have pp_ctl in pp at this point. It is read using
ironlake_get_pp_control, which also needs an update for bxt, as AFAICT
panel unlock is no longer needed and MBZ.
>
> /* Pull timing values out of registers */
> cur.t1_t3 = (pp_on & PANEL_POWER_UP_DELAY_MASK) >>
> @@ -4999,7 +5015,11 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct drm_device *dev,
> cur.t10 = (pp_off & PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_MASK) >>
> PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_SHIFT;
>
> - cur.t11_t12 = ((pp_div & PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) >>
> + if (IS_BROXTON(dev))
> + cur.t11_t12 = (((pp_ctl & BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) >>
> + BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT) - 1) * 1000;
> + else
> + cur.t11_t12 = ((pp_div & PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) >>
> PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT) * 1000;
>
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("cur t1_t3 %d t8 %d t9 %d t10 %d t11_t12 %d\n",
> @@ -5057,13 +5077,23 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct drm_device *dev,
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> u32 pp_on, pp_off, pp_div, port_sel = 0;
> int div = HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev) ? intel_pch_rawclk(dev) : intel_hrawclk(dev);
> - int pp_on_reg, pp_off_reg, pp_div_reg;
> + int pp_on_reg, pp_off_reg, pp_div_reg = 0, pp_ctrl_reg;
> enum port port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->port;
> const struct edp_power_seq *seq = &intel_dp->pps_delays;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->pps_mutex);
>
> - if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
> + if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
> + /*
> + * TODO: BXT has 2 sets of PPS registers.
> + * Correct Register for Broxton need to be identified
> + * using VBT. hardcoding for now
> + */
> + pp_ctrl_reg = BXT_PP_CONTROL(0);
> + pp_on_reg = BXT_PP_ON_DELAYS(0);
> + pp_off_reg = BXT_PP_OFF_DELAYS(0);
> +
> + } else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
> pp_on_reg = PCH_PP_ON_DELAYS;
> pp_off_reg = PCH_PP_OFF_DELAYS;
> pp_div_reg = PCH_PP_DIVISOR;
> @@ -5089,9 +5119,16 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct drm_device *dev,
> (seq->t10 << PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_SHIFT);
> /* Compute the divisor for the pp clock, simply match the Bspec
> * formula. */
> - pp_div = ((100 * div)/2 - 1) << PP_REFERENCE_DIVIDER_SHIFT;
> - pp_div |= (DIV_ROUND_UP(seq->t11_t12, 1000)
> - << PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT);
> + if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
> + pp_div = I915_READ(pp_ctrl_reg);
> + pp_div &= ~BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK;
> + pp_div |= (DIV_ROUND_UP((seq->t11_t12 + 1), 1000)
> + << BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT);
> + } else {
> + pp_div = ((100 * div)/2 - 1) << PP_REFERENCE_DIVIDER_SHIFT;
> + pp_div |= (DIV_ROUND_UP(seq->t11_t12, 1000)
> + << PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT);
> + }
>
> /* Haswell doesn't have any port selection bits for the panel
> * power sequencer any more. */
> @@ -5108,11 +5145,17 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct drm_device *dev,
>
> I915_WRITE(pp_on_reg, pp_on);
> I915_WRITE(pp_off_reg, pp_off);
> - I915_WRITE(pp_div_reg, pp_div);
> + if (IS_BROXTON(dev))
> + I915_WRITE(pp_ctrl_reg, pp_div);
> + else
> + I915_WRITE(pp_div_reg, pp_div);
>
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("panel power sequencer register settings: PP_ON %#x, PP_OFF %#x, PP_DIV %#x\n",
> I915_READ(pp_on_reg),
> I915_READ(pp_off_reg),
> + IS_BROXTON(dev) ?
> + ((I915_READ(pp_ctrl_reg) && BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK)
Should be & not &&. Not sure if the shift is needed really.
BR,
Jani.
> + >> BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT) :
> I915_READ(pp_div_reg));
> }
>
> --
> 2.0.1
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list