[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/skl: corrected csr mutex lock declaration.

[Daniel Vetter]

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 01:02:08PM +0530, Animesh Manna wrote:
> Specifically csr mutex lock is to protect csr-related data structures
> so declaration moved intel_csr structure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: A.Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c  |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h  |  6 +++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c | 12 ++++++------
>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> index a238889..78e6ae8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> @@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags)
>  	spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->mmio_flip_lock);
>  	mutex_init(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
>  	mutex_init(&dev_priv->modeset_restore_lock);
> -	mutex_init(&dev_priv->csr_lock);
> +	mutex_init(&dev_priv->csr.csr_lock);
>  
>  	intel_pm_setup(dev);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 136d42a..43011d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -676,6 +676,9 @@ enum csr_state {
>  };
>  
>  struct intel_csr {
> +	/* CSR protection, used to protect firmware loading status: csr_state */
> +	struct mutex csr_lock;

csr_ prefix is redundant. But the real trouble is that essentially your
open-coding a completion using this mutex and csr->state. And that's just
confusing compared to using completions directly. Can you please replace
the usage of csr->state with a completion and remove the mutex entirely?
-Daniel

> +
>  	const char *fw_path;
>  	__be32 *dmc_payload;
>  	uint32_t dmc_fw_size;
> @@ -1592,9 +1595,6 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
>  
>  	struct intel_csr csr;
>  
> -	/* Display CSR-related protection */
> -	struct mutex csr_lock;
> -
>  	struct intel_gmbus gmbus[GMBUS_NUM_PINS];
>  
>  	/** gmbus_mutex protects against concurrent usage of the single hw gmbus
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
> index 174106f..b03b9b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
> @@ -195,9 +195,9 @@ enum csr_state intel_csr_load_status_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	enum csr_state state;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->csr_lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->csr.csr_lock);
>  	state = dev_priv->csr.state;
> -	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->csr_lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->csr.csr_lock);
>  
>  	return state;
>  }
> @@ -212,9 +212,9 @@ enum csr_state intel_csr_load_status_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  void intel_csr_load_status_set(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  			enum csr_state state)
>  {
> -	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->csr_lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->csr.csr_lock);
>  	dev_priv->csr.state = state;
> -	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->csr_lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->csr.csr_lock);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ void intel_csr_load_program(struct drm_device *dev)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->csr_lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->csr.csr_lock);
>  	fw_size = dev_priv->csr.dmc_fw_size;
>  	for (i = 0; i < fw_size; i++)
>  		I915_WRITE(CSR_PROGRAM_BASE + i * 4,
> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ void intel_csr_load_program(struct drm_device *dev)
>  	}
>  
>  	dev_priv->csr.state = FW_LOADED;
> -	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->csr_lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->csr.csr_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static void finish_csr_load(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
> -- 
> 2.0.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch