[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/bios: be more explicit about discarding iomem address space
shuang.he at intel.com
shuang.he at intel.com
Thu May 14 02:06:01 PDT 2015
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he at intel.com)
Task id: 6408
-------------------------------------Summary-------------------------------------
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
PNV 272/272 272/272
ILK 302/302 302/302
SNB -1 315/315 314/315
IVB 343/343 343/343
BYT 287/287 287/287
BDW -1 317/317 316/317
-------------------------------------Detailed-------------------------------------
Platform Test drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
SNB igt at pm_rpm@dpms-mode-unset-non-lpsp DMESG_WARN(2)PASS(1) DMESG_WARN(1)
(dmesg patch applied)WARNING:at_drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:#assert_device_not_suspended[i915]()@WARNING:.* at .* assert_device_not_suspended+0x
*BDW igt at gem_flink@basic PASS(2) DMESG_WARN(1)
(dmesg patch applied)WARNING:at_drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:#assert_plane[i915]()@WARNING:.* at .* assert_plane
assertion_failure at assertion failure
WARNING:at_drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c:#drm_wait_one_vblank[drm]()@WARNING:.* at .* drm_wait_one_vblank+0x
Note: You need to pay more attention to line start with '*'
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list