[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/bios: be more explicit about discarding iomem address space

shuang.he at intel.com shuang.he at intel.com
Thu May 14 02:06:01 PDT 2015


Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he at intel.com)
Task id: 6408
-------------------------------------Summary-------------------------------------
Platform          Delta          drm-intel-nightly          Series Applied
PNV                                  272/272              272/272
ILK                                  302/302              302/302
SNB                 -1              315/315              314/315
IVB                                  343/343              343/343
BYT                                  287/287              287/287
BDW                 -1              317/317              316/317
-------------------------------------Detailed-------------------------------------
Platform  Test                                drm-intel-nightly          Series Applied
 SNB  igt at pm_rpm@dpms-mode-unset-non-lpsp      DMESG_WARN(2)PASS(1)      DMESG_WARN(1)
(dmesg patch applied)WARNING:at_drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:#assert_device_not_suspended[i915]()@WARNING:.* at .* assert_device_not_suspended+0x
*BDW  igt at gem_flink@basic      PASS(2)      DMESG_WARN(1)
(dmesg patch applied)WARNING:at_drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:#assert_plane[i915]()@WARNING:.* at .* assert_plane
assertion_failure at assertion failure
WARNING:at_drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c:#drm_wait_one_vblank[drm]()@WARNING:.* at .* drm_wait_one_vblank+0x
Note: You need to pay more attention to line start with '*'


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list