[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix the confusing comment about the ioctl limits

[Daniel Vetter]

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 02:57:19PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> It was reported that this comment was confusing, and indeed it is.
> 
> v2: (one year later!) Add the range for the DRM_I915_* iotcl defines
>     (Daniel)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com>

Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel

> ---
>  include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> index 4851d66..6e1a2ed 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> @@ -171,8 +171,12 @@ typedef struct _drm_i915_sarea {
>  #define I915_BOX_TEXTURE_LOAD  0x8
>  #define I915_BOX_LOST_CONTEXT  0x10
>  
> -/* I915 specific ioctls
> - * The device specific ioctl range is 0x40 to 0x79.
> +/*
> + * i915 specific ioctls.
> + *
> + * The device specific ioctl range is [DRM_COMMAND_BASE, DRM_COMMAND_END) ie
> + * [0x40, 0xa0) (a0 is excluded). The numbers below are defined as offset
> + * against DRM_COMMAND_BASE and should be between [0x0, 0x60).
>   */
>  #define DRM_I915_INIT		0x00
>  #define DRM_I915_FLUSH		0x01
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch