[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: merge the two hpd loops in intel_hpd_irq_handler to one

Jani Nikula jani.nikula at intel.com
Thu May 28 05:43:51 PDT 2015


Nothing in the two consecutive loops over hpd pins depends on state in a
larger context than the single hpd pin. If we skip the rest of the loop
on short hpd pulses, we can merge the two loops into one.

Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 11 +++--------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 4840b21c1869..b53b91744a17 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -1463,22 +1463,17 @@ static void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_device *dev,
 			 * For long HPD pulses we want to have the digital queue happen,
 			 * but we still want HPD storm detection to function.
 			 */
+			queue_dig = true;
 			if (long_hpd) {
 				dev_priv->hotplug.long_port_mask |= (1 << port);
+				/* FIXME: this can be simplified. */
 				dig_port_mask |= hpd[i];
 			} else {
 				/* for short HPD just trigger the digital queue */
 				dev_priv->hotplug.short_port_mask |= (1 << port);
-				hotplug_trigger &= ~hpd[i];
+				continue;
 			}
-
-			queue_dig = true;
 		}
-	}
-
-	for_each_hpd_pin(i) {
-		if (!(hpd[i] & hotplug_trigger))
-			continue;
 
 		if (dev_priv->hotplug.stats[i].state == HPD_DISABLED) {
 			/*
-- 
2.1.4



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list