[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 10/12] drm/i915: HSW cdclk support

Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Fri May 29 06:51:55 PDT 2015


On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:30:41PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:22:40AM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Implement support for changing the cdclk frequency during runtime on
> > HSW. VLV/CHV already have support for this, so we can follow their
> > example for the most part. Only the actual hardware programming differs,
> > the rest is pretty much the same.
> > 
> > The pipe pixel rate stuff is handled a bit differently for now due to
> > the difference in pch vs. gmch pfit handling. Eventually we should unify
> > that part to eliminate what is essentially duplicated code.
> > 
> > v2: Grab rps.hw_lock around sandybridge_pcode_write()
> > v3: Rebase due to power well vs. .global_resources() reordering
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > v3: Rebased to the latest
> > v4: Reformatting 'haswell_modeset_global_pipes' function to
> >     support atomic state
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> > 
> > Author:    Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> 
> Apart from the small remark below, it looks like it does what the spec
> tell us to do.
> 
> However there are a few extra comments:
> 
>   - I remember someone saying changing CDCLK hasn't been validated on
>     HSW, that's usually a red flag. Even if it seems like it's working,
>     I've no idea what the pcode does with the notification on ULX for
>     instance

Yeah I suppose it's better to reorder things so that the BDW patch comes
first. Then if we decide to drop the HSW one it won't cause problems for
the BDW patch.

>   - Changing CDCLK means we have to bring whole display down and up
>     again, which will make the current display flicker when hotplugging
>     a screen that needs a CDCLK bump for instance.
>   - it'd be nice to have some idea of the power gain running at a lower
>     frequency
> 
> -- 
> Damien
> 
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h      |   3 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 161 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  2 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index 14366c8..015fe12 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -6701,6 +6701,7 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
> >  #define	  GEN6_PCODE_READ_RC6VIDS		0x5
> >  #define     GEN6_ENCODE_RC6_VID(mv)		(((mv) - 245) / 5)
> >  #define     GEN6_DECODE_RC6_VID(vids)		(((vids) * 5) + 245)
> > +#define   HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ		0x17
> >  #define   GEN9_PCODE_READ_MEM_LATENCY		0x6
> >  #define     GEN9_MEM_LATENCY_LEVEL_MASK		0xFF
> >  #define     GEN9_MEM_LATENCY_LEVEL_1_5_SHIFT	8
> > @@ -7159,10 +7160,12 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
> >  #define  LCPLL_PLL_LOCK			(1<<30)
> >  #define  LCPLL_CLK_FREQ_MASK		(3<<26)
> >  #define  LCPLL_CLK_FREQ_450		(0<<26)
> > +#define  LCPLL_CLK_FREQ_ALT_HSW		(1<<26) /* 337.5 (ULX) or 540 */
> >  #define  LCPLL_CLK_FREQ_54O_BDW		(1<<26)
> >  #define  LCPLL_CLK_FREQ_337_5_BDW	(2<<26)
> >  #define  LCPLL_CLK_FREQ_675_BDW		(3<<26)
> >  #define  LCPLL_CD_CLOCK_DISABLE		(1<<25)
> > +#define  LCPLL_ROOT_CD_CLOCK_DISABLE	(1<<24)
> >  #define  LCPLL_CD2X_CLOCK_DISABLE	(1<<23)
> >  #define  LCPLL_POWER_DOWN_ALLOW		(1<<22)
> >  #define  LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK		(1<<21)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index febf993..556d0ec7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -5545,7 +5545,16 @@ static void intel_update_max_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> >  
> > -	if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) {
> > +	if (IS_HASWELL(dev)) {
> > +		if (I915_READ(FUSE_STRAP) & HSW_CDCLK_LIMIT)
> > +			dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq = 450000;
> > +		else if (IS_HSW_ULX(dev))
> > +			dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq = 337500;
> > +		else if (IS_HSW_ULT(dev))
> > +			dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq = 450000;
> > +		else
> > +			dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq = 540000;
> > +	} else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) {
> >  		dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq = 400000;
> >  	} else {
> >  		/* otherwise assume cdclk is fixed */
> > @@ -9404,6 +9413,139 @@ static void broxton_modeset_global_resources(struct drm_atomic_state *old_state)
> >  		broxton_set_cdclk(dev, req_cdclk);
> >  }
> >  
> > +/* compute the max rate for new configuration */
> > +static int ilk_max_pixel_rate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > +{
> > +	struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
> > +	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> > +	int max_pixel_rate = 0;
> > +
> > +	for_each_intel_crtc(dev, crtc) {
> > +		if (crtc->new_enabled)
> > +			max_pixel_rate = max((int)max_pixel_rate,
> > +					     (int)ilk_pipe_pixel_rate(crtc->config));
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return max_pixel_rate;
> > +}
> 
> new_enabled doesn't look like what we want to look at, it looks like a
> temporary field we shouldn't be using in new code. Maybe
> crtc->state->enable instead?
> 
> > +
> > +static int haswell_calc_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +			      int max_pixel_rate)
> > +{
> > +	int cdclk;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * FIXME should also account for plane ratio
> > +	 * once 64bpp pixel formats are supported.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (max_pixel_rate > 450000)
> > +		cdclk = 540000;
> > +	else if (max_pixel_rate > 337500 || !IS_HSW_ULX(dev_priv))
> > +		cdclk = 450000;
> > +	else
> > +		cdclk = 337500;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * FIXME move the cdclk caclulation to
> > +	 * compute_config() so we can fail gracegully.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (cdclk > dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq) {
> > +		DRM_ERROR("requested cdclk (%d kHz) exceeds max (%d kHz)\n",
> > +			  cdclk, dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq);
> > +		cdclk = dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return cdclk;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void haswell_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
> > +{
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > +	uint32_t val;
> > +
> > +	if (WARN((I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
> > +		  (LCPLL_PLL_DISABLE | LCPLL_PLL_LOCK |
> > +		   LCPLL_CD_CLOCK_DISABLE | LCPLL_ROOT_CD_CLOCK_DISABLE |
> > +		   LCPLL_CD2X_CLOCK_DISABLE | LCPLL_POWER_DOWN_ALLOW |
> > +		   LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK)) != LCPLL_PLL_LOCK,
> > +		 "trying to change cdclk frequency with cdclk not enabled\n"))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	val = I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL);
> > +	val &= ~LCPLL_CLK_FREQ_MASK;
> > +
> > +	switch (cdclk) {
> > +	case 450000:
> > +		val |= LCPLL_CLK_FREQ_450;
> > +		break;
> > +	case 337500:
> > +	case 540000:
> > +		val |= LCPLL_CLK_FREQ_ALT_HSW;
> > +		break;
> > +	default:
> > +		WARN(1, "invalid cdclk frequency\n");
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	I915_WRITE(LCPLL_CTL, val);
> > +
> > +	if (IS_HSW_ULX(dev)) {
> > +		mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> > +		sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
> > +					cdclk == 337500);
> > +		mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	intel_update_cdclk(dev);
> > +
> > +	WARN(cdclk != dev_priv->cdclk_freq,
> > +	     "cdclk requested %d kHz but got %d kHz\n",
> > +	     cdclk, dev_priv->cdclk_freq);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int haswell_modeset_global_pipes(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> > +{
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->dev);
> > +	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> > +	struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> > +	int max_pixclk = ilk_max_pixel_rate(dev_priv);
> > +	int cdclk, i;
> > +
> > +	cdclk = haswell_calc_cdclk(dev_priv, max_pixclk);
> > +
> > +	if (cdclk == dev_priv->cdclk_freq)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	/* add all active pipes to the state */
> > +	for_each_crtc(state->dev, crtc) {
> > +		if (!crtc->state->enable)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> > +		if (IS_ERR(crtc_state))
> > +			return PTR_ERR(crtc_state);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* disable/enable all currently active pipes while we change cdclk */
> > +	for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i)
> > +		if (crtc_state->enable)
> > +			crtc_state->mode_changed = true;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void haswell_modeset_global_resources(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> > +{
> > +	struct drm_device *dev = state->dev;
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > +	int max_pixel_rate = ilk_max_pixel_rate(dev_priv);
> > +	int req_cdclk = haswell_calc_cdclk(dev_priv, max_pixel_rate);
> > +
> > +	if (req_cdclk != dev_priv->cdclk_freq) {
> > +		haswell_set_cdclk(dev, req_cdclk);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int haswell_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> >  				      struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  {
> > @@ -12582,10 +12724,16 @@ static int __intel_set_mode_checks(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> >  	 * mode set on this crtc.  For other crtcs we need to use the
> >  	 * adjusted_mode bits in the crtc directly.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev) || IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
> > -		ret = valleyview_modeset_global_pipes(state);
> > -		if (ret)
> > -			return ret;
> > +	if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev) || IS_BROXTON(dev) || IS_HASWELL(dev)) {
> > +		if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev) || IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
> > +			ret = valleyview_modeset_global_pipes(state);
> > +			if (ret)
> > +				return ret;
> > +		} else {
> > +			ret = haswell_modeset_global_pipes(state);
> > +			if (ret)
> > +				return ret;
> > +		}
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	ret = __intel_set_mode_setup_plls(state);
> > @@ -14468,6 +14616,9 @@ static void intel_init_display(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  		dev_priv->display.fdi_link_train = ivb_manual_fdi_link_train;
> >  	} else if (IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) {
> >  		dev_priv->display.fdi_link_train = hsw_fdi_link_train;
> > +		if (IS_HASWELL(dev))
> > +			dev_priv->display.modeset_global_resources =
> > +				haswell_modeset_global_resources;
> >  	} else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) {
> >  		dev_priv->display.modeset_global_resources =
> >  			valleyview_modeset_global_resources;
> > -- 
> > 1.9.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list