[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] igt/kms_rotation_crc: Add a subtest to validate Y-tiled obj + Y fb modifier (v5)
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Mon Nov 2 01:41:43 PST 2015
On 31/10/15 01:45, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
> Hi Tvrtko,
>
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:22:08 +0000
> Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 30/10/15 01:44, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
>>> The main goal of this subtest is to trigger the following warning in
>>> the function i915_gem_object_get_fence():
>>> if (WARN_ON(!obj->map_and_fenceable))
>>>
>>> To trigger this warning, the subtest first creates a Y-tiled object
>>> and an associated framebuffer with the Y-fb modifier. Furthermore,
>>> to prevent the map_and_fenceable from being set, we make sure that
>>> the object does not have a normal VMA by refraining from rendering
>>> to the object and by setting the rotation property upfront before
>>> calling commit.
>>>
>>> v2: Do not call paint_squares and just use one output.
>>>
>>> v3: Convert an if condition to igt_require and move the plane
>>> rotation requirement further up before the fb allocation.
>>>
>>> v4: After setting rotation to 90 and committing, change the
>>> rotation to 0 and commit once more. This is to test if the i915
>>> driver hits any warnings while pinning and unpinning an object that
>>> has both normal and rotated views.
>>>
>>> v5:
>>> - Add another subtest to toggle the order of rotation
>>> - Exhaustively test the i915 driver's pinning and unpinning code
>>> paths for any fence leaks by iterating until MAX available fences.
>>>
>>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> tests/kms_rotation_crc.c | 84
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 84
>>> insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
>>> index cc9847e..34f8150 100644
>>> --- a/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
>>> +++ b/tests/kms_rotation_crc.c
>>> @@ -264,6 +264,80 @@ static void test_plane_rotation(data_t *data,
>>> enum igt_plane plane_type) igt_require_f(valid_tests, "no valid
>>> crtc/connector combinations found\n"); }
>>>
>>> +static void test_plane_rotation_ytiled_obj(data_t *data, enum
>>> igt_plane plane_type,
>>> + int toggle)
>>> +{
>>> + igt_display_t *display = &data->display;
>>> + uint64_t tiling = LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED;
>>> + uint32_t format = DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888;
>>> + int bpp = igt_drm_format_to_bpp(format);
>>> + enum igt_commit_style commit = COMMIT_LEGACY;
>>> + int fd = data->gfx_fd;
>>> + igt_output_t *output = &display->outputs[0];
>>> + igt_plane_t *plane;
>>> + drmModeModeInfo *mode;
>>> + unsigned int stride, size, w, h;
>>> + uint32_t gem_handle;
>>> + int num_fences = gem_available_fences(fd);
>>> + int i, ret;
>>> +
>>> + igt_require(output != NULL && output->valid == true);
>>> +
>>> + plane = igt_output_get_plane(output, plane_type);
>>> + igt_require(igt_plane_supports_rotation(plane));
>>> +
>>> + if (plane_type == IGT_PLANE_PRIMARY || plane_type ==
>>> IGT_PLANE_CURSOR) {
>>> + igt_require(data->display.has_universal_planes);
>>> + commit = COMMIT_UNIVERSAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + mode = igt_output_get_mode(output);
>>> + w = mode->hdisplay;
>>> + h = mode->vdisplay;
>>> +
>>> + for (stride = 512; stride < (w * bpp / 8); stride *= 2)
>>> + ;
>>> + for (size = 1024*1024; size < stride * h; size *= 2)
>>> + ;
>>> +
>>> + gem_handle = gem_create(fd, size);
>>> + ret = __gem_set_tiling(fd, gem_handle, I915_TILING_Y,
>>> stride);
>>> + igt_assert(ret == 0);
>>> +
>>> + do_or_die(__kms_addfb(fd, gem_handle, w, h, stride,
>>> + format, tiling, LOCAL_DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS,
>>> + &data->fb.fb_id));
>>> + data->fb.width = w;
>>> + data->fb.height = h;
>>> + data->fb.gem_handle = gem_handle;
>>> +
>>> + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
>>> + igt_display_commit(display);
>>> +
>>> + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, &data->fb);
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_fences + 1; i++) {
>>> + igt_plane_set_rotation(plane, toggle ?
>>> IGT_ROTATION_0 : IGT_ROTATION_90);
>>> + drmModeObjectSetProperty(fd,
>>> plane->drm_plane->plane_id,
>>> + DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE,
>>> + plane->rotation_property,
>>> + plane->rotation);
>>> + ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, commit);
>>> + igt_assert(ret == 0);
>>> +
>>> + igt_plane_set_rotation(plane, toggle ?
>>> IGT_ROTATION_90 : IGT_ROTATION_0);
>>> + drmModeObjectSetProperty(fd,
>>> plane->drm_plane->plane_id,
>>> + DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE,
>>> + plane->rotation_property,
>>> + plane->rotation);
>>> + ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, commit);
>>> + igt_assert(ret == 0);
>>> + }
>>
>> It manages to exhaust the fences with only one object? I was
>> expecting that multiple objects will be required since if it is only
>> one how come it allocates more than one fence register?
>
> Before I sent out this version, I did try with two objects to see if it
> triggers any WARNs but it didn't. I am not sure if I did it right
> though, I'll take a look at it again. However, when I tried this
> version, that is, single-object-multiple-views, it did trigger the
> following WARNS:
>
> WARN_ON(!ggtt_vma || dev_priv->fence_regs[obj->fence_reg].pin_count >
> ggtt_vma->pin_count)
>
> if (WARN_ON(fence->pin_count))
>
> I tested these with v3 of my i915 driver patch. Of-course, with v4,
> I don't seen any WARNs. I'll take a closer look at triggering
> any WARNs with 2 or more objects. However, one thing that was not clear
I thought you would need number of framebuffers / objects > num_fences
and display all of them to trigger the running out of fences ref leak.
> to me was when you said unpin both (in your previous comment), I was
> wondering how I can do that from the test. Did you mean something like
> this:
>
> igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
> igt_display_commit(display);
Couldn't find in this thread where I said "unpin both" so don't know.
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list