[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/31] drm/i915: Reduce PSR re-activation time for VLV/CHV.
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Thu Nov 5 10:50:15 PST 2015
With 'commit 30886c5a ("drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR: Increase wait delay
time before active PSR.")' we fixed a blank screen when first
activation was happening immediately after PSR being enabled.
There we gave more time for idleness by increasing the delay
between re-activating sequences.
However, commit "drm/i915: Delay first PSR activation."
delay the first activation in a better way keeping a good PSR
residency. So, we can now reduce the delay on re-enable.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index 6e7e8e6..c090f38 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -738,7 +738,6 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_device *dev,
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
struct drm_crtc *crtc;
enum pipe pipe;
- int delay_ms = HAS_DDI(dev) ? 100 : 500;
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
@@ -759,7 +758,7 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_device *dev,
if (!dev_priv->psr.active && !dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits)
if (!work_busy(&dev_priv->psr.work.work))
schedule_delayed_work(&dev_priv->psr.work,
- msecs_to_jiffies(delay_ms));
+ msecs_to_jiffies(100));
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
}
--
2.4.3
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list