[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Move the fbdev async_schedule() into intel_fbdev.c
Lukas Wunner
lukas at wunner.de
Tue Nov 10 08:27:55 PST 2015
Hi Ville,
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 01:00:50PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 05:44:37PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > Hi Ville,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:08:33PM +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Reading the driver load/unload code leaves one confused as there's
> > > an async_schedule() in the load, but not async_synchronize_full()
> > > in sight. In fact it's hidden inside intel_fbdev.c. So let's move the
> > > async_schedule() into intel_fbdev.c as well so that it's next to the
> > > async_synchronize_full(), which should make the relationship easier
> > > to see.
> >
> > Hm, what do you think about solving it the other way round, i.e. moving
> > the async_synchronize_full() to i915_driver_unload()? Incidentally I was
> > working on this same part of the code and that's how I solved it. This way
> > it's possible to call intel_fbdev_fini() from intel_fbdev_initial_config().
> > With your solution this would deadlock.
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/l1k/linux/commit/aa12badac846
> > Message-Id: <aa12badac846f24b49d83768146b62e2ac159eb3.1446987413.git.lukas at wunner.de>
> >
>
> I think I'd still like to hide it all in intel_fbdev.c. You could just
> split the fbdev_fini() into two parts; one doing the real work, and the
> second one just doing async_synchronize + call the first one.
Looking at this with a fresh pair of eyeballs I realized I could simply
call async_synchronize_full() conditionally if (!current_is_async()),
thereby differentiating between fbdev_fini() being called from
i915_driver_unload() versus intel_fbdev_initial_config().
If your patch gets pushed, I think I'll rebase and solve it like that.
Thanks for your input,
Lukas
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Lukas
> >
> >
> > > Plus this way we won't schedule a nop function call when fbdev is
> > > disabled. And we were passing a pointer to a static inline
> > > function to async_schedule(), which seems rather dubious to me.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 3 +--
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c | 7 ++++++-
> > > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> > > index c58048f..cae3d78 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> > > @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
> > >
> > > #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> > >
> > > -#include <linux/async.h>
> > > #include <drm/drmP.h>
> > > #include <drm/drm_crtc_helper.h>
> > > #include <drm/drm_fb_helper.h>
> > > @@ -437,7 +436,7 @@ static int i915_load_modeset_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > * scanning against hotplug events. Hence do this first and ignore the
> > > * tiny window where we will loose hotplug notifactions.
> > > */
> > > - async_schedule(intel_fbdev_initial_config, dev_priv);
> > > + intel_fbdev_initial_config_async(dev);
> > >
> > > drm_kms_helper_poll_init(dev);
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > > index 00d9882..50c78b6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > > @@ -1298,7 +1298,7 @@ void intel_dvo_init(struct drm_device *dev);
> > > /* legacy fbdev emulation in intel_fbdev.c */
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION
> > > extern int intel_fbdev_init(struct drm_device *dev);
> > > -extern void intel_fbdev_initial_config(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie);
> > > +extern void intel_fbdev_initial_config_async(struct drm_device *dev);
> > > extern void intel_fbdev_fini(struct drm_device *dev);
> > > extern void intel_fbdev_set_suspend(struct drm_device *dev, int state, bool synchronous);
> > > extern void intel_fbdev_output_poll_changed(struct drm_device *dev);
> > > @@ -1309,7 +1309,7 @@ static inline int intel_fbdev_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static inline void intel_fbdev_initial_config(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)
> > > +static inline void intel_fbdev_initial_config_async(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > {
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c
> > > index 840d6bf..fe1fdb6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c
> > > @@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ int intel_fbdev_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -void intel_fbdev_initial_config(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)
> > > +static void intel_fbdev_initial_config(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)
> > > {
> > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = data;
> > > struct intel_fbdev *ifbdev = dev_priv->fbdev;
> > > @@ -711,6 +711,11 @@ void intel_fbdev_initial_config(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)
> > > drm_fb_helper_initial_config(&ifbdev->helper, ifbdev->preferred_bpp);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +void intel_fbdev_initial_config_async(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > + async_schedule(intel_fbdev_initial_config, to_i915(dev));
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > void intel_fbdev_fini(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > {
> > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > > --
> > > 2.4.10
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list