[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix GT frequency rounding
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Mon Nov 16 05:28:10 PST 2015
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Bob Paauwe <bob.j.paauwe at intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:29:41 +0200
> Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> When we set and later readback a frequency value through
>> sysfs interface, igt/pm_rpm assumes that we get same value back
>> if it matches hw granularity.
>>
>> On bxt we have found out that this is not always the case.
>> Currently frequency - hw ratio - frequency conversions round down,
>> with few exceptions on platforms that have more specific conversions.
>> On bxt the supported range can be for example from 100Mhz to 650Mhz.
>> Midpoint is then calculated by test to be 375 which pm_rps uses to find a
>> closest hw supported frequency. That is 366 (ratio 22),
>> which it then writes back. But as the rounding down kicks in,
>> driver actually sets 350 instead of 366, as 366 is 2/3 below 22 * 50/3.
>>
>> Fix this by rounding to closest instead of rounding down in
>> freq-ratio-freq conversions.
>>
>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92768
>> Testcase: igt/pm_rps/basic-api
>> Tested-by: Bob Paauwe <bob.j.paauwe at intel.com>
>> Cc: Bob Paauwe <bob.j.paauwe at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 8 +++++---
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> index 647c0ff..740623f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> @@ -7139,7 +7139,8 @@ static int chv_freq_opcode(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int val)
>> int intel_gpu_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int val)
>> {
>> if (IS_GEN9(dev_priv->dev))
>> - return (val * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER) / GEN9_FREQ_SCALER;
>> + return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(val * GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER,
>> + GEN9_FREQ_SCALER);
>> else if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv->dev))
>> return chv_gpu_freq(dev_priv, val);
>> else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv->dev))
>> @@ -7151,13 +7152,14 @@ int intel_gpu_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int val)
>> int intel_freq_opcode(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int val)
>> {
>> if (IS_GEN9(dev_priv->dev))
>> - return (val * GEN9_FREQ_SCALER) / GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
>> + return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(val * GEN9_FREQ_SCALER,
>> + GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER);
>> else if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv->dev))
>> return chv_freq_opcode(dev_priv, val);
>> else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv->dev))
>> return byt_freq_opcode(dev_priv, val);
>> else
>> - return val / GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
>> + return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(val, GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER);
>> }
>>
>> struct request_boost {
>
> Reviewed-by: Bob Paauwe <bob.j.paauwe at intel.com>
Pushed to drm-intel-fixes, thanks for the patch and review.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list