[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Cleaning up intel_dp_hpd_pulse
Shubhangi Shrivastava
shubhangi.shrivastava at intel.com
Mon Nov 16 22:53:08 PST 2015
On Monday 16 November 2015 08:16 PM, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 16:33 +0200, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
>> On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 17:58 +0530, Shubhangi Shrivastava wrote:
>>> Current DP detection has DPCD operations split across
>>> intel_dp_hpd_pulse and intel_dp_detect which contains
>>> duplicates as well. Also intel_dp_detect is called
>>> during modes enumeration as well which will result
>>> in multiple dpcd operations. So this patch tries
>>> to solve both these by bringing all DPCD operations
>>> in one single function and make intel_dp_detect
>>> use existing values instead of repeating same steps.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani at intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shubhangi Shrivastava <shubhangi.shrivastava at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 19 ++++---------------
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>> index a0fe827..4e74cd6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>> @@ -4881,7 +4881,8 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool
>>> force)
>>> return connector_status_disconnected;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - intel_dp_long_pulse(intel_dp->attached_connector);
>>> + if (force)
>>> + intel_dp_long_pulse(intel_dp->attached_connector);
>>>
>>> if (intel_connector->detect_edid)
>>> return connector_status_connected;
>>> @@ -5211,21 +5212,9 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port
>>> *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd)
>>> /* indicate that we need to restart link training */
>>> intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
>>>
>>> - if (!intel_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, intel_dig_port))
>>> - goto mst_fail;
>>> + intel_dp_long_pulse(intel_dp->attached_connector);
>>> + goto put_power;
> This skips the line that sets ret to IRQ_HANDLED, which will cause the hotplug
> code to "fall back to old school hpd".
>
> Ander
Notification of hotplug to user mode goes from i915_hotplug_work_func.
Returning IRQ_NONE from here will notify user mode about hotplug.
>
>>>
>>> - if (!intel_dp_get_dpcd(intel_dp)) {
>>> - goto mst_fail;
>>> - }
>> So we don't call this for eDP anymore on long pulse, which I assume is
>> harmless
>> since the bits we are reading from DPCD shouldn't change?
>>
>>> -
>>> - intel_dp_probe_oui(intel_dp);
>>> -
>>> - if (!intel_dp_probe_mst(intel_dp)) {
>>> - drm_modeset_lock(&dev
>>> ->mode_config.connection_mutex, NULL);
>>> - intel_dp_check_link_status(intel_dp);
>>> - drm_modeset_unlock(&dev
>>> ->mode_config.connection_mutex);
>>> - goto mst_fail;
>>> - }
>> Hmm, so this is where that hunk from patch 1 I said should be a separate patch
>> comes from. Looks like in belongs to this patch.
>>
>>> } else {
>>> if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
>>> if (intel_dp_check_mst_status(intel_dp) == -EINVAL)
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list