[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/skl+: Fix Watermark calculation for Broxton
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Tue Nov 17 07:11:44 PST 2015
On 17/11/15 14:52, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 09:53:35AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:41:18PM +0530, Kumar, Mahesh wrote:
>>>> In case of Y-Tiling, "plane_blocks_per_line" calculation is different
>>>> than X/None-Tiling case.
>>>> This patch corrects this calculation according to Bspec.
>>>> plane blocks per line = Plane memory format is Y tile ?
>>>> ceiling[4 * plane bytes per line / 512]/4 :
>>>> ceiling[plane bytes per line / 512]
>>>> As per BSpec Don't increment selected "result_blocks" & "result_lines"
>>>> in case of BROXTON.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar, Mahesh <mahesh1.kumar at intel.com>
>>>
>>> Confirmed both changes against bspec. Note that your first hunk here is
>>> technically a fix for both SKL and BXT, only the second one is a
>>> BXT-specific fix.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
>>
>> This needs to be rebased (p_params is gone).
>
> And we already have this for skl
>
> commit 0fda65680e92545caea5be7805a7f0a617fb6c20
> Author: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> Date: Fri Feb 27 15:12:35 2015 +0000
>
> drm/i915/skl: Update watermarks for Y tiling
>
> Mahesh, please check if you still need to make changes for BXT.
Mahesh's patch seems to be on top of that one, so either a new doc
change or something I've missed back then.
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list