[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Remove PSR Perf Counter for SKL+
R, Durgadoss
durgadoss.r at intel.com
Wed Nov 18 22:09:12 PST 2015
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Rodrigo Vivi
>Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 6:10 AM
>To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo
>Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Remove PSR Perf Counter for SKL+
>
>Whenever DMC firmware put the HW into DC State a bunch
>of registers including this perf counter is reset to 0 and
>never restored.
>
>So, even with PSR active and working we could still read
>"Performance_Counter: 0" what will misslead people to believe
>PSR is broken.
>
>So, it is better to remove this counter information while
>we don't have a better way to track PSR residency.
Agreed..
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r at intel.com>
Thanks,
Durga
>
>Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
>index 038d5c6..71e1666 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
>@@ -2580,8 +2580,11 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> }
> seq_puts(m, "\n");
>
>- /* CHV PSR has no kind of performance counter */
>- if (HAS_DDI(dev)) {
>+ /*
>+ * VLV/CHV PSR has no kind of performance counter
>+ * SKL+ Perf counter is reset to 0 everytime DC state is entered
>+ */
>+ if (IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) {
> psrperf = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_PERF_CNT) &
> EDP_PSR_PERF_CNT_MASK;
>
>--
>2.4.3
>
>_______________________________________________
>Intel-gfx mailing list
>Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list