[Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND 15/20] drm/exynos: drop struct_mutex from exynos_drm_gem_get_ioctl

[Daniel Vetter]

The only things this protects is reading ->flags and ->size, both of
which are invariant over the lifetime of an exynos gem bo. So no
locking needed at all (besides that, nothing protects the writers
anyway).

Aside: exynos_gem_obj->size is redundant with
exynos_gem_obj->base.size and probably should be removed.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c
index a3286a1ec2b1..dfb3bfee1b63 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c
@@ -352,12 +352,9 @@ int exynos_drm_gem_get_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 	struct drm_exynos_gem_info *args = data;
 	struct drm_gem_object *obj;
 
-	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-
 	obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(dev, file_priv, args->handle);
 	if (!obj) {
 		DRM_ERROR("failed to lookup gem object.\n");
-		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -367,7 +364,6 @@ int exynos_drm_gem_get_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 	args->size = exynos_gem->size;
 
 	drm_gem_object_unreference(obj);
-	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.5.1