[Intel-gfx] [RFC 15/37] drm/i915: add i915_wait_request() call after i915_add_request_no_flush()

John.C.Harrison at Intel.com John.C.Harrison at Intel.com
Mon Nov 23 03:41:50 PST 2015


From: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon at intel.com>

Per-context initialisation GPU instructions (which are injected directly
into the ringbuffer rather than being submitted as a batch) should not
be allowed to mix with user-generated batches in the same submission; it
will cause confusion for the GuC (which might merge a subsequent
preemptive request with the non-preemptive iniitalisation code), and for
the scheduler, which wouldn't know how to reinject a non-batch request
if it were the victim of preemption.

Therefore, we should wait for the iniitalisation request to complete
before making the newly-initialised context available for user-mode
submissions.

Here, we add a call to i915_wait_request() after each existing call to
i915_add_request_no_flush() (in i915_gem_init_hw(), for the default
per-engine contexts, and intel_lr_context_deferred_create(), for all
others).

Adapted from Alex's earlier patch, which added the wait only to
intel_lr_context_render_state_init(), and which John Harrison was
dubious about:
    "JH thinks this isn't a good idea. Why do we need to wait?".
But we will need to after all, if only because of preemption.

For: VIZ-2021
Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c  | 7 +++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 785310c..895f1e5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -5332,6 +5332,13 @@ i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev)
 		}
 
 		i915_add_request_no_flush(req);
+
+		/* GuC firmware will try to collapse its DPC work queue if the new one
+		 * is for same context. So the following breadcrumb could be amended to
+		 * this batch and submitted as one batch. Wait here to make sure the
+		 * context state init is finished before any other submission to GuC. */
+		if (i915.enable_guc_submission)
+			ret = i915_wait_request(req);
 	}
 
 out:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index e99ae53..ca7bc61 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -2635,6 +2635,13 @@ int intel_lr_context_deferred_alloc(struct intel_context *ctx,
 			goto error_ringbuf;
 		}
 		i915_add_request_no_flush(req);
+
+		/* GuC firmware will try to collapse its DPC work queue if the new one
+		 * is for same context. So the following breadcrumb could be amended to
+		 * this batch and submitted as one batch. Wait here to make sure the
+		 * context state init is finished before any other submission to GuC. */
+		if (i915.enable_guc_submission)
+			ret = i915_wait_request(req);
 	}
 
 	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev->dev_private);
-- 
1.9.1



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list