[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove incorrect warning in context cleanup
Daniel Stone
daniel at fooishbar.org
Tue Nov 24 06:18:56 PST 2015
Hey,
On 24 November 2015 at 13:59, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:29:07PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On 24 November 2015 at 13:27, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:17:57PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> >> On 24/11/15 12:53, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> >> >The WARN_ON is accurate though. The original patch fails to fix even the
>> >> >limited aspect of the bug it claimed to.
>> >>
>> >> That is not true. It only makes it a bit more limited, and not by
>> >> its fault even. Even with that it makes things a bit better, not
>> >> worse.
>> >
>> > It makes the code worse for very limited improvement, for which we did
>> > not have a publically reported bug, i.e. the impact is very small.
>>
>> I can get the person who reported it to me to raise a Bugzilla
>> complaining about the WARN_ON if you like ...
>
> This is about the original bug, for with the bugfix resulted in the
> WARN_ON now being removed here. The underlying problem (I think, it's a
> maze) is that our vma active tracking is a bit ... underwhelming.
Sure, which is fair enough, but OTOH is there an actual plan for
redoing the VMA tracking?
Cheers,
Daniel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list