[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/drm_import_export: Always loop with mutex held
Winiarski, Michal
michal.winiarski at intel.com
Wed Nov 25 05:38:05 PST 2015
On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 15:20 +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> We assume that lock is held on start of the loop scope.
> Some paths continuing inside loop didn't adhere to this
> assumption, causing segfault on unlocking an already
> unlocked mutex. Fix this by re-aquiring lock always.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93013
> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski at intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Wood <thomas.wood at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/drm_import_export.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/drm_import_export.c b/tests/drm_import_export.c
> index 49486ab..cfe5f6d 100644
> --- a/tests/drm_import_export.c
> +++ b/tests/drm_import_export.c
> @@ -161,20 +161,20 @@ static void *import_close_thread(void *data)
> pthread_mutex_unlock(&t->mutex);
> }
> else
> - /* We take the lock right after
> entering the loop */
> + /* Lock should be held on entering
> the loop */
> continue;
> }
> +
> if (bo == NULL) {
> /*
> * If the bo is NULL it means that we've
> unreferenced in other
> * thread - therefore we should expect
> ENOENT
> */
> igt_assert_eq(errno, ENOENT);
> - continue;
> + } else {
> + drm_intel_bo_unreference(bo);
> }
>
> - drm_intel_bo_unreference(bo);
> -
> pthread_mutex_lock(&t->mutex);
> }
> pthread_mutex_unlock(&t->mutex);
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list