[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/snb: remove pre-production hardware workaround

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 11:17:44AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 18 +-----------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 52642aff1dab..1e67484fd5dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -4558,22 +4558,6 @@ void i915_gem_init_swizzling(struct drm_device *dev)
>  		BUG();
>  }
>  
> -static bool
> -intel_enable_blt(struct drm_device *dev)
> -{
> -	if (!HAS_BLT(dev))
> -		return false;
> -
> -	/* The blitter was dysfunctional on early prototypes */
> -	if (IS_GEN6(dev) && dev->pdev->revision < 8) {

I'm not actually sure what the revi<->stepping mapping on SNB is. My SNB
is a D2 I believe, and it has rev=0x9, so 0x8 is probably D1. I think D2
was the first production stepping, and D1 may have gotten out as
samples. So this would perhaps affect D0 and older steppings, which seems
fine to me.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

> -		DRM_INFO("BLT not supported on this pre-production hardware;"
> -			 " graphics performance will be degraded.\n");
> -		return false;
> -	}
> -
> -	return true;
> -}
> -
>  static void init_unused_ring(struct drm_device *dev, u32 base)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> @@ -4616,7 +4600,7 @@ int i915_gem_init_rings(struct drm_device *dev)
>  			goto cleanup_render_ring;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (intel_enable_blt(dev)) {
> +	if (HAS_BLT(dev)) {
>  		ret = intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(dev);
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto cleanup_bsd_ring;
> -- 
> 2.1.4

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC