[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Restore lost DPLL register write on gen2-4

[Daniel Vetter]

On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:08:24PM +0300, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> 
> We accidentally lost the initial DPLL register write in
> 1c4e02746147 drm/i915: Fix DVO 2x clock enable on 830M
> 
> The "three times for luck" hack probably saved us from a total
> disaster. But anyway, bring the initial write back so that the
> code actually makes some sense.
> 
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler at draconx.ca>
Reported-and-tested-by: Nick Bowler <nbowler at draconx.ca>
References: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-October/077463.html

> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 147e700..f4fdff9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -1743,6 +1743,8 @@ static void i9xx_enable_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>  			   I915_READ(DPLL(!crtc->pipe)) | DPLL_DVO_2X_MODE);

Don't we also need a POSTING_READ here to make sure the two-step 2x mode
sequence is still followed?

With that addressed Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>  	}
>  
> +	I915_WRITE(reg, dpll);
> +
>  	/* Wait for the clocks to stabilize. */
>  	POSTING_READ(reg);
>  	udelay(150);
> -- 
> 2.4.9
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch