[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915: Clean up associated VMAs on context destruction

Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Oct 8 07:03:11 PDT 2015


Hi,

On 08/10/15 14:45, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:26:36PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>
>> Prevent leaking VMAs and PPGTT VMs when objects are imported
>> via flink.
>>
>> Scenario is that any VMAs created by the importer will be left
>> dangling after the importer exits, or destroys the PPGTT context
>> with which they are associated.
>>
>> This is caused by object destruction not running when the
>> importer closes the buffer object handle due the reference held
>> by the exporter. This also leaks the VM since the VMA has a
>> reference on it.
>>
>> In practice these leaks can be observed by stopping and starting
>> the X server on a kernel with fbcon compiled in. Every time
>> X server exits another VMA will be leaked against the fbcon's
>> frame buffer object.
>>
>> Also on systems where flink buffer sharing is used extensively,
>> like Android, this leak has even more serious consequences.
>>
>> This version is takes a general approach from the  earlier work
>> by Rafael Barbalho (drm/i915: Clean-up PPGTT on context
>> destruction) and tries to incorporate the subsequent discussion
>> between Chris Wilson and Daniel Vetter.
>>
>> v2:
>>
>> Removed immediate cleanup on object retire - it was causing a
>> recursive VMA unbind via i915_gem_object_wait_rendering. And
>> it is in fact not even needed since by definition context
>> cleanup worker runs only after the last context reference has
>> been dropped, hence all VMAs against the VM belonging to the
>> context are already on the inactive list.
>>
>> v3:
>>
>> Previous version could deadlock since VMA unbind waits on any
>> rendering on an object to complete. Objects can be busy in a
>> different VM which would mean that the cleanup loop would do
>> the wait with the struct mutex held.
>>
>> This is an even simpler approach where we just unbind VMAs
>> without waiting since we know all VMAs belonging to this VM
>> are idle, and there is nothing in flight, at the point
>> context destructor runs.
>>
>> v4:
>>
>> Double underscore prefix for __915_vma_unbind_no_wait and a
>> commit message typo fix. (Michel Thierry)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>> Testcase: igt/gem_ppgtt.c/flink-and-exit-vma-leak
>> Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>
>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Rafael Barbalho <rafael.barbalho at intel.com>
>> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         |  5 +++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c         | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index 824e7245044d..58afa1bb2957 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -2840,6 +2840,11 @@ i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>>   int i915_vma_bind(struct i915_vma *vma, enum i915_cache_level cache_level,
>>   		  u32 flags);
>>   int __must_check i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma);
>> +/*
>> + * BEWARE: Do not use the function below unless you can _absolutely_
>> + * _guarantee_ VMA in question is _not in use_ anywhere.
>> + */
>> +int __must_check __i915_vma_unbind_no_wait(struct i915_vma *vma);
>>   int i915_gem_object_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
>>   void i915_gem_release_all_mmaps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>   void i915_gem_release_mmap(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> index f0cfbb9ee12c..52642aff1dab 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> @@ -3208,7 +3208,7 @@ static void i915_gem_object_finish_gtt(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>>   					    old_write_domain);
>>   }
>>
>> -int i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
>> +static int __i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma, bool wait)
>>   {
>>   	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = vma->obj;
>>   	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = obj->base.dev->dev_private;
>> @@ -3227,9 +3227,11 @@ int i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
>>
>>   	BUG_ON(obj->pages == NULL);
>>
>> -	ret = i915_gem_object_wait_rendering(obj, false);
>> -	if (ret)
>> -		return ret;
>> +	if (wait) {
>> +		ret = i915_gem_object_wait_rendering(obj, false);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +	}
>>
>>   	if (i915_is_ggtt(vma->vm) &&
>>   	    vma->ggtt_view.type == I915_GGTT_VIEW_NORMAL) {
>> @@ -3274,6 +3276,16 @@ int i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> +int i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
>> +{
>> +	return __i915_vma_unbind(vma, true);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __i915_vma_unbind_no_wait(struct i915_vma *vma)
>> +{
>> +	return __i915_vma_unbind(vma, false);
>> +}
>> +
>>   int i915_gpu_idle(struct drm_device *dev)
>>   {
>>   	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
>> index 74aa0c9929ba..680b4c9f6b73 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
>> @@ -133,6 +133,23 @@ static int get_context_size(struct drm_device *dev)
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>>
>> +static void i915_gem_context_clean(struct intel_context *ctx)
>> +{
>> +	struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt = ctx->ppgtt;
>> +	struct i915_vma *vma, *next;
>> +
>> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ppgtt))
>> +		return;
>
> [   80.242892] [drm:i915_gem_open]
> [   80.250485] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [   80.258938] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 277 at ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c:141 i915_gem_context_free+0xef/0x27b [i915]()
> [   80.275344] WARN_ON_ONCE(!ppgtt)

Ha, I did not see how ctx->ppgtt == NULL could exist but wanted to be 
extra safe since i915_ppgtt_put checks for that.

I'll send a follow up patch to remove the warn.

Regards,

Tvrtko


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list