[Intel-gfx] [BXT DSI timing fixes v1 2/3] drm/i915/bxt: Get pipe timing for BXT DSI

Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Mon Oct 12 10:23:59 PDT 2015


On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:55:02PM +0530, Uma Shankar wrote:
> For BXT DSI, vtotal, vactive, hactive registers are different.
> Making changes to intel_crtc_mode_get() and get_pipe_timings(),
> to read the correct registers for BXT DSI.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 75c60b8..2717823 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -7708,6 +7708,7 @@ static void intel_get_pipe_timings(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>  	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = pipe_config->cpu_transcoder;
> +	bool is_dsi = intel_pipe_has_type(crtc, INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI);
>  	uint32_t tmp;
>  
>  	tmp = I915_READ(HTOTAL(cpu_transcoder));
> @@ -7736,6 +7737,26 @@ static void intel_get_pipe_timings(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  		pipe_config->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_end += 1;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (IS_BROXTON(dev) && is_dsi) {
> +		struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> +
> +		for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, &crtc->base, encoder) {
> +			struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi =
> +				enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> +			enum port port;
> +
> +			for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) {
> +				pipe_config->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_hdisplay =
> +					I915_READ(BXT_MIPI_TRANS_HACTIVE(port));
> +				pipe_config->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay =
> +					I915_READ(BXT_MIPI_TRANS_VACTIVE(port));
> +				pipe_config->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_vtotal =
> +					I915_READ(BXT_MIPI_TRANS_VTOTAL(port));
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +	}

I think I already asked this earlier when this patch was posted; Don't
the normal pipe timing registers contain the same values? And if so, why
would you need to read them out from the DSI speciific registers?

> +
>  	tmp = I915_READ(PIPESRC(crtc->pipe));
>  	pipe_config->pipe_src_h = (tmp & 0xffff) + 1;
>  	pipe_config->pipe_src_w = ((tmp >> 16) & 0xffff) + 1;
> @@ -10664,6 +10685,7 @@ struct drm_display_mode *intel_crtc_mode_get(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	int vtot = I915_READ(VTOTAL(cpu_transcoder));
>  	int vsync = I915_READ(VSYNC(cpu_transcoder));
>  	enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> +	bool is_dsi = intel_pipe_has_type(intel_crtc, INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI);
>  
>  	mode = kzalloc(sizeof(*mode), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!mode)
> @@ -10684,15 +10706,35 @@ struct drm_display_mode *intel_crtc_mode_get(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	i9xx_crtc_clock_get(intel_crtc, &pipe_config);
>  
>  	mode->clock = pipe_config.port_clock / pipe_config.pixel_multiplier;
> -	mode->hdisplay = (htot & 0xffff) + 1;
>  	mode->htotal = ((htot & 0xffff0000) >> 16) + 1;
>  	mode->hsync_start = (hsync & 0xffff) + 1;
>  	mode->hsync_end = ((hsync & 0xffff0000) >> 16) + 1;
> -	mode->vdisplay = (vtot & 0xffff) + 1;
> -	mode->vtotal = ((vtot & 0xffff0000) >> 16) + 1;
>  	mode->vsync_start = (vsync & 0xffff) + 1;
>  	mode->vsync_end = ((vsync & 0xffff0000) >> 16) + 1;
>  
> +	if (IS_BROXTON(dev) && is_dsi) {
> +		struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> +
> +		for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, &intel_crtc->base, encoder) {
> +			struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi =
> +				enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> +			enum port port;
> +
> +			for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) {
> +				mode->vtotal =
> +					I915_READ(BXT_MIPI_TRANS_VTOTAL(port));
> +				mode->hdisplay =
> +					I915_READ(BXT_MIPI_TRANS_HACTIVE(port));
> +				mode->vdisplay =
> +					I915_READ(BXT_MIPI_TRANS_VACTIVE(port));
> +			}
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		mode->vtotal = ((vtot & 0xffff0000) >> 16) + 1;
> +		mode->hdisplay = (htot & 0xffff) + 1;
> +		mode->vdisplay = (vtot & 0xffff) + 1;
> +	}
> +
>  	drm_mode_set_name(mode);
>  
>  	return mode;
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list