[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] core_prop_blob ioctl_wrappers: Fix new tests/benchmarks for android

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Tue Oct 13 08:35:10 PDT 2015


On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 04:16:18PM +0100, Derek Morton wrote:
> Changes since #1b492e311 have broken the Android build. This patch
> fixes the build for Android.
> 
> core_prop_blob was using ioctls not in the android kernel. Added a
> igt_require_propblob() function and local defines/structures so the
> test will compile and skip on kernels where the feature is unsupported.
> 
> gem_blt - included igt.h
> 
> Signed-off-by: Derek Morton <derek.j.morton at intel.com>
> ---
>  benchmarks/gem_blt.c   |  4 +---
>  lib/ioctl_wrappers.c   | 13 +++++++++++++
>  lib/ioctl_wrappers.h   | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/core_prop_blob.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/benchmarks/gem_blt.c b/benchmarks/gem_blt.c
> index 181a5f1..8ab5302 100644
> --- a/benchmarks/gem_blt.c
> +++ b/benchmarks/gem_blt.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>   *
>   */
>  
> +#include "igt.h"
>  #include <unistd.h>
>  #include <stdlib.h>
>  #include <stdint.h>
> @@ -39,9 +40,6 @@
>  #include <time.h>
>  
>  #include "drm.h"
> -#include "ioctl_wrappers.h"
> -#include "drmtest.h"
> -#include "intel_chipset.h"
>  
>  #define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC (1<<11)
>  #define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT (1<<12)
> diff --git a/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c b/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c
> index 80e1ec6..cf34f25 100644
> --- a/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c
> +++ b/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c
> @@ -1219,6 +1219,19 @@ void igt_require_fb_modifiers(int fd)
>  	igt_require(has_modifiers);
>  }
>  
> +void igt_require_propblob(int fd)
> +{
> +	struct local_drm_mode_create_blob c;
> +	struct local_drm_mode_destroy_blob d;
> +	uint32_t blob_data;
> +	c.data = &blob_data;
> +	c.length = sizeof(blob_data);
> +
> +	igt_require(drmIoctl(fd, LOCAL_DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CREATEPROPBLOB, &c) == 0);
> +	d.blob_id = c.blob_id;
> +	igt_require(drmIoctl(fd, LOCAL_DRM_IOCTL_MODE_DESTROYPROPBLOB, &d) == 0);
> +}

If you want to do this in the library the usual way is to wrap the ioctls
as functions and put the relevant -ENOTTY check in there as an
igt_require, followed by an igt_assert for anything else that might have
gone wrong.

I'd just keep this in the test as a static function though, since then you
don't have to write api docs ;-)
-Daniel

> +
>  int __kms_addfb(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint32_t width, uint32_t height,
>  		uint32_t stride, uint32_t pixel_format, uint64_t modifier,
>  		uint32_t flags, uint32_t *buf_id)
> diff --git a/lib/ioctl_wrappers.h b/lib/ioctl_wrappers.h
> index f4deca6..aeb224c 100644
> --- a/lib/ioctl_wrappers.h
> +++ b/lib/ioctl_wrappers.h
> @@ -149,6 +149,20 @@ struct local_drm_mode_fb_cmd2 {
>  	uint64_t modifier[4];
>  };
>  
> +struct local_drm_mode_get_blob {
> +	uint32_t blob_id;
> +	uint32_t length;
> +	uint64_t data;
> +};
> +struct local_drm_mode_create_blob {
> +	uint64_t data;
> +	uint32_t length;
> +	uint32_t blob_id;
> +};
> +struct local_drm_mode_destroy_blob {
> +	uint32_t blob_id;
> +};
> +
>  #define LOCAL_DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS	(1<<1)
>  
>  #define LOCAL_DRM_FORMAT_MOD_VENDOR_INTEL	0x01
> @@ -165,9 +179,17 @@ struct local_drm_mode_fb_cmd2 {
>  #define LOCAL_DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ADDFB2	DRM_IOWR(0xB8, \
>  						 struct local_drm_mode_fb_cmd2)
>  
> +#define LOCAL_DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETPROPBLOB	DRM_IOWR(0xAC, \
> +						struct local_drm_mode_get_blob)
> +#define LOCAL_DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CREATEPROPBLOB	DRM_IOWR(0xBD, \
> +						struct local_drm_mode_create_blob)
> +#define LOCAL_DRM_IOCTL_MODE_DESTROYPROPBLOB	DRM_IOWR(0xBE, \
> +						struct local_drm_mode_destroy_blob)
> +
>  #define LOCAL_DRM_CAP_ADDFB2_MODIFIERS	0x10
>  
>  void igt_require_fb_modifiers(int fd);
> +void igt_require_propblob(int fd);
>  
>  /**
>   * __kms_addfb:
> diff --git a/tests/core_prop_blob.c b/tests/core_prop_blob.c
> index d704158..ff56482 100644
> --- a/tests/core_prop_blob.c
> +++ b/tests/core_prop_blob.c
> @@ -25,16 +25,12 @@
>   *   Daniel Stone <daniels at collabora.com>
>   */
>  
> +#include "igt.h"
>  #include <errno.h>
>  #include <stdbool.h>
>  #include <stdio.h>
>  #include <string.h>
>  
> -#include "drmtest.h"
> -#include "igt_debugfs.h"
> -#include "igt_kms.h"
> -#include "igt_aux.h"
> -
>  IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Tests behaviour of mass-data 'blob' properties.");
>  
>  static const struct drm_mode_modeinfo test_mode_valid = {
> @@ -64,19 +60,19 @@ static const struct drm_mode_modeinfo test_mode_valid = {
>  static int
>  validate_prop(int fd, uint32_t prop_id)
>  {
> -	struct drm_mode_get_blob get;
> +	struct local_drm_mode_get_blob get;
>  	struct drm_mode_modeinfo ret_mode;
>  
>  	get.blob_id = prop_id;
>  	get.length = 0;
>  	get.data = (uintptr_t) 0;
> -	ioctl_or_ret_errno(fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETPROPBLOB, &get);
> +	ioctl_or_ret_errno(fd, LOCAL_DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETPROPBLOB, &get);
>  
>  	if (get.length != sizeof(test_mode_valid))
>  		return ENOMEM;
>  
>  	get.data = (uintptr_t) &ret_mode;
> -	ioctl_or_ret_errno(fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETPROPBLOB, &get);
> +	ioctl_or_ret_errno(fd, LOCAL_DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETPROPBLOB, &get);
>  
>  	if (memcmp(&ret_mode, &test_mode_valid, sizeof(test_mode_valid)) != 0)
>  		return EINVAL;
> @@ -87,12 +83,12 @@ validate_prop(int fd, uint32_t prop_id)
>  static uint32_t
>  create_prop(int fd)
>  {
> -	struct drm_mode_create_blob create;
> +	struct local_drm_mode_create_blob create;
>  
>  	create.length = sizeof(test_mode_valid);
>  	create.data = (uintptr_t) &test_mode_valid;
>  
> -	do_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CREATEPROPBLOB, &create);
> +	do_ioctl(fd, LOCAL_DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CREATEPROPBLOB, &create);
>  	igt_assert_neq_u32(create.blob_id, 0);
>  
>  	return create.blob_id;
> @@ -101,10 +97,10 @@ create_prop(int fd)
>  static int
>  destroy_prop(int fd, uint32_t prop_id)
>  {
> -	struct drm_mode_destroy_blob destroy;
> +	struct local_drm_mode_destroy_blob destroy;
>  
>  	destroy.blob_id = prop_id;
> -	ioctl_or_ret_errno(fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_DESTROYPROPBLOB, &destroy);
> +	ioctl_or_ret_errno(fd, LOCAL_DRM_IOCTL_MODE_DESTROYPROPBLOB, &destroy);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -112,8 +108,8 @@ destroy_prop(int fd, uint32_t prop_id)
>  static void
>  test_validate(int fd)
>  {
> -	struct drm_mode_create_blob create;
> -	struct drm_mode_get_blob get;
> +	struct local_drm_mode_create_blob create;
> +	struct local_drm_mode_get_blob get;
>  	char too_small[32];
>  	uint32_t prop_id;
>  
> @@ -122,24 +118,24 @@ test_validate(int fd)
>  	/* Outlandish size. */
>  	create.length = 0x10000;
>  	create.data = (uintptr_t) &too_small;
> -	do_ioctl_err(fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CREATEPROPBLOB, &create, EFAULT);
> +	do_ioctl_err(fd, LOCAL_DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CREATEPROPBLOB, &create, EFAULT);
>  
>  	/* Outlandish address. */
>  	create.length = sizeof(test_mode_valid);
>  	create.data = (uintptr_t) 0xdeadbeee;
> -	do_ioctl_err(fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CREATEPROPBLOB, &create, EFAULT);
> +	do_ioctl_err(fd, LOCAL_DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CREATEPROPBLOB, &create, EFAULT);
>  
>  	/* When we pass an incorrect size, the kernel should correct us. */
>  	prop_id = create_prop(fd);
>  	get.blob_id = prop_id;
>  	get.length = sizeof(too_small);
>  	get.data = (uintptr_t) too_small;
> -	do_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETPROPBLOB, &get);
> +	do_ioctl(fd, LOCAL_DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETPROPBLOB, &get);
>  	igt_assert_eq_u32(get.length, sizeof(test_mode_valid));
>  
>  	get.blob_id = prop_id;
>  	get.data = (uintptr_t) 0xdeadbeee;
> -	do_ioctl_err(fd, DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CREATEPROPBLOB, &create, EFAULT);
> +	do_ioctl_err(fd, LOCAL_DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CREATEPROPBLOB, &create, EFAULT);
>  }
>  
>  static void
> @@ -211,9 +207,12 @@ igt_main
>  	igt_fixture {
>  		fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_ANY);
>  		igt_require(fd >= 0);
> -		test_basic(fd);
> +		igt_require_propblob(fd);
>  	}
>  
> +	igt_subtest("basic")
> +		test_basic(fd);
> +
>  	igt_subtest("blob-prop-core")
>  		test_core(fd);
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list