[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/18] drm/i915: alloc/free the FBC CFB during enable/disable
Zanoni, Paulo R
paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com
Wed Oct 21 11:30:09 PDT 2015
Em Qua, 2015-10-21 às 09:24 +0200, Daniel Vetter escreveu:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:20:55AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:11:08AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:50:01AM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > > > One of the problems with the current code is that it frees the
> > > > CFB and
> > > > releases its drm_mm node as soon as we flip FBC's enable bit.
> > > > This is
> > > > bad because after we disbale FBC the hardware may still use the
> > > > CFB
> > > > for the rest of the frame, so in theory we should only release
> > > > the
> > > > drm_mm node one frame after we disable FBC. Otherwise, a stolen
> > > > memory
> > > > allocation done right after an FBC disable may result in either
> > > > corrupted memory for the new owner of that memory region or
> > > > corrupted
> > > > screen/underruns in case the new owner changes it while the
> > > > hardware
> > > > is still reading it. This case is not exactly easy to reproduce
> > > > since
> > > > we currently don't do a lot of stolen memory allocations, but I
> > > > see
> > > > patches on the mailing list trying to expose stolen memory to
> > > > user
> > > > space, so races will be possible.
> > > >
> > > > I thought about three different approaches to solve this, and
> > > > they all
> > > > have downsides.
> > > >
> > > > The first approach would be to simply use multiple drm_mm nodes
> > > > and
> > > > freeing the unused ones only after a frame has passed. The
> > > > problem
> > > > with this approach is that since stolen memory is rather small,
> > > > there's a risk we just won't be able to allocate a new CFB from
> > > > stolen
> > > > if the previous one was not freed yet. This could happen in
> > > > case we
> > > > quickly disable FBC from pipe A and decide to enable it on pipe
> > > > B, or
> > > > just if we change pipe A's fb stride while FBC is enabled.
> > > >
> > > > The second approach would be similar to the first one, but
> > > > maintaining
> > > > a single drm_mm node and keeping track of when it can be
> > > > reused. This
> > > > would remove the disadvantage of not having enough space for
> > > > two
> > > > nodes, but would create the new problem where we may not be
> > > > able to
> > > > enable FBC at the point intel_fbc_update() is called, so we
> > > > would have
> > > > to add more code to retry updating FBC after the time has
> > > > passed. And
> > > > that can quickly get too complex since we can get invalidate,
> > > > flush,
> > > > flip_prepare, disable and other calls in the middle of the
> > > > wait.
> > > >
> > > > Both solutions above - and also the current code - have the
> > > > problem
> > > > that we unnecessarily free+realloc FBC during invalidate+flush
> > > > operations even if the CFB size doesn't change.
> > > >
> > > > The third option would be to move the allocation/deallocation
> > > > to
> > > > enable/disable. This makes sure that the pipe is always
> > > > disabled when
> > > > we allocate/deallocate the CFB, so there's no risk that the FBC
> > > > hardware may read or write to the memory right after it is
> > > > freed from
> > > > drm_mm. The downside is that it is possible for user space to
> > > > change
> > > > the buffer stride without triggering a disable/enable - only
> > > > deactivate/activate -, so we'll have to handle this case
> > > > somehow, even
> > > > though it is uncommon - see igt's kms_frontbuffer_tracking
> > > > test,
> > > > fbc-stridechange subtest. It could be possible to implement a
> > > > way to
> > > > free+alloc the CFB during said stride change, but it would
> > > > involve a
> > > > lot of book-keeping - exactly as mentioned above - just for a
> > > > rare
> > > > case, so for now I'll keep it simple and just deactivate FBC.
> > > > Besides,
> > > > we may not even need to disable FBC since we do CFB over-
> > > > allocation.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > > ----------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> > > > index bf855b2..48d8cfc 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> > > > @@ -59,6 +59,45 @@ static unsigned int
> > > > get_crtc_fence_y_offset(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > > > return crtc->base.y - crtc->adjusted_y;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * For SKL+, the plane source size used by the hardware is
> > > > based on the value we
> > > > + * write to the PLANE_SIZE register. For BDW-, the hardware
> > > > looks at the value
> > > > + * we wrote to PIPESRC.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static void intel_fbc_get_plane_source_size(struct intel_crtc
> > > > *crtc,
> > > > + int *width, int
> > > > *height)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct intel_plane_state *plane_state =
> > > > + to_intel_plane_state(crtc-
> > > > >base.primary->state);
> > > > + int w, h;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (intel_rotation_90_or_270(plane_state-
> > > > >base.rotation)) {
> > > > + w = drm_rect_height(&plane_state->src) >> 16;
> > > > + h = drm_rect_width(&plane_state->src) >> 16;
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + w = drm_rect_width(&plane_state->src) >> 16;
> > > > + h = drm_rect_height(&plane_state->src) >> 16;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (width)
> > > > + *width = w;
> > > > + if (height)
> > > > + *height = h;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int intel_fbc_calculate_cfb_size(struct intel_crtc
> > > > *crtc,
> > > > + struct drm_framebuffer
> > > > *fb)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = crtc->base.dev-
> > > > >dev_private;
> > > > + int lines;
> > > > +
> > > > + intel_fbc_get_plane_source_size(crtc, NULL, &lines);
> > > > + if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen >= 7)
> > > > + lines = min(lines, 2048);
> > > > +
> > > > + return lines * fb->pitches[0];
> > >
> > > Why are we even looking at fb->pitches here? I thought that for
> > > fbc we
> > > only compress what we actually scan out, i.e. the source
> > > rectangle of the
> > > plane in pixels. Maybe some rounding involved perhaps.
> >
> > IIRC the docs do say the hw uses the plane stride register figure
> > this
> > out. It's something I've been wondering for a few years now, but
> > never
> > actually tested to see if we can get away with less.
So we have a volunteer to implement the stolen memory checker? :)
> In that case a comment would be great, maybe even with the Bspec
> citation.
Well, the docs talk about the stride and the HW guys confirmed it, so
it didn't seem to be as something that needed a comment.
You can also git-blame it :)
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel/commit/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel
_fbc.c?id=c4ffd40908c30a33291227920e921f6b45b9e8f7
> -Daniel
>
> >
> > >
> > > Or did I miss something?
> > > -Daniel
> > >
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static void i8xx_fbc_deactivate(struct drm_i915_private
> > > > *dev_priv)
> > > > {
> > > > u32 fbc_ctl;
> > > > @@ -604,11 +643,17 @@ again:
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static int intel_fbc_alloc_cfb(struct drm_i915_private
> > > > *dev_priv, int size,
> > > > - int fb_cpp)
> > > > +static int intel_fbc_alloc_cfb(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > > > {
> > > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = crtc->base.dev-
> > > > >dev_private;
> > > > + struct drm_framebuffer *fb = crtc->base.primary-
> > > > >state->fb;
> > > > struct drm_mm_node *uninitialized_var(compressed_llb);
> > > > - int ret;
> > > > + int size, fb_cpp, ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + WARN_ON(dev_priv->fbc.compressed_fb.allocated);
> > > > +
> > > > + size = intel_fbc_calculate_cfb_size(crtc, fb);
> > > > + fb_cpp = drm_format_plane_cpp(fb->pixel_format, 0);
> > > >
> > > > ret = find_compression_threshold(dev_priv, &dev_priv-
> > > > >fbc.compressed_fb,
> > > > size, fb_cpp);
> > > > @@ -685,64 +730,6 @@ void intel_fbc_cleanup_cfb(struct
> > > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > > mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->fbc.lock);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -/*
> > > > - * For SKL+, the plane source size used by the hardware is
> > > > based on the value we
> > > > - * write to the PLANE_SIZE register. For BDW-, the hardware
> > > > looks at the value
> > > > - * we wrote to PIPESRC.
> > > > - */
> > > > -static void intel_fbc_get_plane_source_size(struct intel_crtc
> > > > *crtc,
> > > > - int *width, int
> > > > *height)
> > > > -{
> > > > - struct intel_plane_state *plane_state =
> > > > - to_intel_plane_state(crtc-
> > > > >base.primary->state);
> > > > - int w, h;
> > > > -
> > > > - if (intel_rotation_90_or_270(plane_state-
> > > > >base.rotation)) {
> > > > - w = drm_rect_height(&plane_state->src) >> 16;
> > > > - h = drm_rect_width(&plane_state->src) >> 16;
> > > > - } else {
> > > > - w = drm_rect_width(&plane_state->src) >> 16;
> > > > - h = drm_rect_height(&plane_state->src) >> 16;
> > > > - }
> > > > -
> > > > - if (width)
> > > > - *width = w;
> > > > - if (height)
> > > > - *height = h;
> > > > -}
> > > > -
> > > > -static int intel_fbc_calculate_cfb_size(struct intel_crtc
> > > > *crtc)
> > > > -{
> > > > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = crtc->base.dev-
> > > > >dev_private;
> > > > - struct drm_framebuffer *fb = crtc->base.primary->fb;
> > > > - int lines;
> > > > -
> > > > - intel_fbc_get_plane_source_size(crtc, NULL, &lines);
> > > > - if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen >= 7)
> > > > - lines = min(lines, 2048);
> > > > -
> > > > - return lines * fb->pitches[0];
> > > > -}
> > > > -
> > > > -static int intel_fbc_setup_cfb(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > > > -{
> > > > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = crtc->base.dev-
> > > > >dev_private;
> > > > - struct drm_framebuffer *fb = crtc->base.primary->fb;
> > > > - int size, cpp;
> > > > -
> > > > - size = intel_fbc_calculate_cfb_size(crtc);
> > > > - cpp = drm_format_plane_cpp(fb->pixel_format, 0);
> > > > -
> > > > - if (dev_priv->fbc.compressed_fb.allocated &&
> > > > - size <= dev_priv->fbc.compressed_fb.size *
> > > > dev_priv->fbc.threshold)
> > > > - return 0;
> > > > -
> > > > - /* Release any current block */
> > > > - __intel_fbc_cleanup_cfb(dev_priv);
> > > > -
> > > > - return intel_fbc_alloc_cfb(dev_priv, size, cpp);
> > > > -}
> > > > -
> > > > static bool stride_is_valid(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > > unsigned int stride)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -904,8 +891,19 @@ static void __intel_fbc_update(struct
> > > > intel_crtc *crtc)
> > > > goto out_disable;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - if (intel_fbc_setup_cfb(crtc)) {
> > > > - set_no_fbc_reason(dev_priv, "not enough stolen
> > > > memory");
> > > > + /* It is possible for the required CFB size change
> > > > without a
> > > > + * crtc->disable + crtc->enable since it is possible
> > > > to change the
> > > > + * stride without triggering a full modeset. Since we
> > > > try to
> > > > + * over-allocate the CFB, there's a chance we may keep
> > > > FBC enabled even
> > > > + * if this happens, but if we exceed the current CFB
> > > > size we'll have to
> > > > + * disable FBC. Notice that it would be possible to
> > > > disable FBC, wait
> > > > + * for a frame, free the stolen node, then try to
> > > > reenable FBC in case
> > > > + * we didn't get any invalidate/deactivate calls, but
> > > > this would require
> > > > + * a lot of tracking just for a case we expect to be
> > > > uncommon, so we
> > > > + * just don't have this code for now. */
> > > > + if (intel_fbc_calculate_cfb_size(crtc, fb) >
> > > > + dev_priv->fbc.compressed_fb.size * dev_priv-
> > > > >fbc.threshold) {
> > > > + set_no_fbc_reason(dev_priv, "CFB requirements
> > > > changed");
> > > > goto out_disable;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -958,7 +956,6 @@ out_disable:
> > > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("unsupported config,
> > > > deactivating FBC\n");
> > > > __intel_fbc_deactivate(dev_priv);
> > > > }
> > > > - __intel_fbc_cleanup_cfb(dev_priv);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > @@ -1102,6 +1099,11 @@ void intel_fbc_enable(struct intel_crtc
> > > > *crtc)
> > > > goto out;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > + if (intel_fbc_alloc_cfb(crtc)) {
> > > > + set_no_fbc_reason(dev_priv, "not enough stolen
> > > > memory");
> > > > + goto out;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Enabling FBC on pipe %c\n",
> > > > pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
> > > > dev_priv->fbc.no_fbc_reason = "FBC enabled but not
> > > > active yet\n";
> > > >
> > > > @@ -1129,6 +1131,8 @@ static void __intel_fbc_disable(struct
> > > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > >
> > > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disabling FBC on pipe %c\n",
> > > > pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
> > > >
> > > > + __intel_fbc_cleanup_cfb(dev_priv);
> > > > +
> > > > dev_priv->fbc.enabled = false;
> > > > dev_priv->fbc.crtc = NULL;
> > > > }
> > > > --
> > > > 2.6.1
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daniel Vetter
> > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > > http://blog.ffwll.ch
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> >
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel OTC
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list