[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/20] drm/i915: Fake lost context event interrupts through forced CSB checking.
Tomas Elf
tomas.elf at intel.com
Thu Oct 22 18:32:33 PDT 2015
*** General ***
A recurring issue during long-duration operations testing of concurrent
rendering tasks with intermittent hangs is that context completion interrupts
following engine resets are sometimes lost. This becomes a real problem since
the hardware might have completed a previously hung context following a
per-engine hang recovery and then gone idle somehow without sending an
interrupt telling the driver about this. At this point the driver would be
stuck waiting for context completion, thinking that the context is still
active, even though the hardware would be idle and waiting for more work. The
periodic hang checker would detect hangs caused by stuck workloads in the GPU
as well as these inconsistencies causing software hangs. The difference lies in
how we handle these two types of hangs.
*** Rectification ***
The way hangs caused by inconsistent context submission states are resolved is
by checking the context submission state consistency as a pre-stage to the
engine recovery path. If the state is not consistent at that point then the
normal form of engine recovery is not attempted. Instead, an attempt to rectify
the inconsistency is made by faking the presumed lost context event interrupt -
or more specifically by calling the context event interrupt handler manually
from the hang recovery path outside of the normal interrupt execution context.
The reason this works is because regardless of whether or not an IRQ goes
missing the hardware always updates the CSB buffer during context state
transitions, which means that in the case of a missing IRQ there would be
outstanding CSB events waiting to be processed, out of which one might be the
context completion event belonging to the context currently blocking the work
submission flow in one of the execlist queues. The faked context event
interrupt would then end up in the interrupt handler, which would process the
outstanding events and purge the stuck context.
If this rectification attempt fails (because there are no outstanding CSB
events, at least none that could account for the inconsistency) then the engine
recovery is failed and the error handler falls back to legacy full GPU reset
mode. Assuming the full GPU reset is successful this form of recovery will
always cause the system to become consistent since the GPU is reset and forced
into an idle state and all pending driver work is discarded, which would
consistently reflect the idle GPU hardware state.
If the rectification attempt succeeds, meaning that unprocessed CSB events were
found and acted upon which lead to old contexts being purged from the execlist
queue and new work being submitted to hardware, then the inconsistency
rectification is considered to have successfully resolved the detected hang
that brought on the hang recovery. Therefore the engine recovery is ended early
at that point and no further attempts at resolving the hang are made and the
hang detection is cleared, allowing the driver to resume executing.
*** Detection ***
In principle a context submission status inconsistency is detected by comparing
the ID of the context in the head request of an execlist queue with the context
ID currently in the EXECLIST_STATUS register of the same engine (the latter
denoting the ID of the context currently running on the hardware). If the two
do not match it is assumed that an interrupt was missed and that the driver is
now stuck in an inconsistent state. Of course, the driver and hardware can
go in and out of consistency momentarily many times per second as contexts
start and complete in the driver independently from the actual GPU
hardware. The only way an inconsistency detection can be trusted is by
first making sure that the detected state is stable, either by observing
sustained, initial signs of a hang in the periodic hang checker or at the
onset of the hang recovery path, at which point it has been decided that
the execution is hung and that the driver is stable in that state.
*** WARNING ***
In time-constrained scenarios waiting until the onset of hang recovery before
detecting and potentially rectifying context submission state inconsistencies
might cause problematic side-effects. For example, in Android the
SurfaceFlinger/HWC compositor has a hard time limit of 3 seconds after which
any unresolved hangs might cause display freezes (due to dropped display flip
requests), which can only be resolved by a reboot. If hang detection and hang
recovery takes upwards of 3 seconds then there is a distinct risk that handling
inconsistencies this late might cause issues. Whether or not this will become a
problem remains to be shown in practice. So far no issues have been spotted in
other environments such as X but it is worth being aware of.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf at intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 182 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 32 ++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 83 +++++++++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc_tdr.h | 3 +
5 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index 348dab6..c361b19 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -969,6 +969,120 @@ int i915_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
}
/**
+ * i915_gem_reset_engine_CSSC_precheck - check/rectify context inconsistency
+ * @dev_priv: ...
+ * @engine: The engine whose state is to be checked.
+ * @req: Output parameter containing the request most recently submitted
+ * to hardware, if any. May be NULL.
+ * @ret: Output parameter containing the error code to be returned to
+ * i915_handle_error().
+ *
+ * Before an engine reset can be attempted it is important that the submission
+ * state of the currently running (i.e. hung) context is verified as
+ * consistent. If the context submission state is inconsistent that means that
+ * the context that the driver thinks is running on hardware is in fact not
+ * running at all. It might be that the hardware is idle or is running another
+ * context altogether. The reason why this is important in the case of engine
+ * reset in particular is because at the end of the engine recovery path the
+ * fixed-up context needs to be resubmitted to hardware in order for the
+ * context changes (HEAD register nudged past the hung batch buffer) to take
+ * effect. Context resubmission requires the same context as is resubmitted to
+ * be running on hardware - otherwise we might cause unexpected preemptions or
+ * submit a context to a GPU engine that is idle, which would not make much
+ * sense. (if the engine is idle why does the driver think that the context in
+ * question is hung etc.)
+ * If an inconsistent state like this is detected then a rectification attempt
+ * is made by faking the presumed lost context event interrupt. The outcome of
+ * this attempt is returned back to the per-engine recovery path: If it was
+ * succesful the hang recovery can be aborted early since we now have resolved
+ * the hang this way. If it was not successful then fail the hang recovery and
+ * let the error handler promote to the next level of hang recovery.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * True: Work currently in progress, consistent state.
+ * Proceed with engine reset.
+ * False: No work in progress or work in progress but state irrecoverably
+ * inconsistent (context event IRQ faking attempted but failed).
+ * Do not proceed with engine reset.
+ */
+static bool i915_gem_reset_engine_CSSC_precheck(
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+ struct drm_i915_gem_request **req,
+ int *ret)
+{
+ bool precheck_ok = true;
+ enum context_submission_status status;
+
+ WARN_ON(!ret);
+
+ *ret = 0;
+
+ status = intel_execlists_TDR_get_current_request(engine, req);
+
+ if (status == CONTEXT_SUBMISSION_STATUS_NONE_SUBMITTED) {
+ /*
+ * No work in flight, no way to carry out a per-engine hang
+ * recovery in this state. Just do early exit and forget it
+ * happened. If this state persists then the error handler will
+ * be called by the periodic hang checker soon after this and
+ * at that point the hang will hopefully be promoted to full
+ * GPU reset, which will take care of it.
+ */
+ WARN(1, "No work in flight! Aborting recovery on %s\n",
+ engine->name);
+
+ precheck_ok = false;
+ *ret = 0;
+
+ } else if (status == CONTEXT_SUBMISSION_STATUS_INCONSISTENT) {
+ if (!intel_execlists_TDR_force_CSB_check(dev_priv, engine)) {
+ DRM_ERROR("Inconsistency rectification on %s unsuccessful!\n",
+ engine->name);
+
+ /*
+ * Context submission state is inconsistent and
+ * faking a context event IRQ did not help.
+ * Fail and promote to higher level of
+ * recovery!
+ */
+ precheck_ok = false;
+ *ret = -EINVAL;
+ } else {
+ DRM_INFO("Inconsistency rectification on %s successful!\n",
+ engine->name);
+
+ /*
+ * Rectifying the inconsistent context
+ * submission status helped! No reset required,
+ * just exit and move on!
+ */
+ precheck_ok = false;
+ *ret = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Reset the hangcheck state otherwise the hang checker
+ * will detect another hang immediately. Since the
+ * forced CSB checker resulted in more work being
+ * submitted to hardware we know that we are not hung
+ * anymore so it should be safe to clear any hang
+ * detections for this engine prior to this point.
+ */
+ i915_hangcheck_reinit(engine);
+ }
+
+ } else if (status != CONTEXT_SUBMISSION_STATUS_OK) {
+ WARN(1, "Unexpected context submission status (%u) on %s\n",
+ status, engine->name);
+
+ precheck_ok = false;
+ *ret = -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return precheck_ok;
+}
+
+/**
* i915_reset_engine - reset GPU engine after a hang
* @engine: engine to reset
*
@@ -1009,28 +1123,22 @@ int i915_reset_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
i915_gem_reset_ring_status(dev_priv, engine);
if (i915.enable_execlists) {
- enum context_submission_status status =
- intel_execlists_TDR_get_current_request(engine, NULL);
-
/*
- * If the context submission state in hardware is not
- * consistent with the the corresponding state in the driver or
- * if there for some reason is no current context in the
- * process of being submitted then bail out and try again. Do
- * not proceed unless we have reliable current context state
- * information. The reason why this is important is because
- * per-engine hang recovery relies on context resubmission in
- * order to force the execution to resume following the hung
- * batch buffer. If the hardware is not currently running the
- * same context as the driver thinks is hung then anything can
- * happen at the point of context resubmission, e.g. unexpected
- * preemptions or the previously hung context could be
- * submitted when the hardware is idle which makes no sense.
+ * Check context submission status consistency (CSSC) before
+ * moving on. If the driver and hardware have different
+ * opinions about what is going on and this inconsistency
+ * cannot be rectified then just fail and let TDR escalate to a
+ * higher form of hang recovery.
*/
- if (status != CONTEXT_SUBMISSION_STATUS_OK) {
- ret = -EAGAIN;
+ if (!i915_gem_reset_engine_CSSC_precheck(dev_priv,
+ engine,
+ NULL,
+ &ret)) {
+ DRM_INFO("Aborting hang recovery on %s (%d)\n",
+ engine->name, ret);
+
goto reset_engine_error;
- }
+ }
}
ret = intel_ring_disable(engine);
@@ -1040,27 +1148,25 @@ int i915_reset_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
}
if (i915.enable_execlists) {
- enum context_submission_status status;
- bool inconsistent;
-
- status = intel_execlists_TDR_get_current_request(engine,
- ¤t_request);
-
- inconsistent = (status != CONTEXT_SUBMISSION_STATUS_OK);
- if (inconsistent) {
- /*
- * If we somehow have reached this point with
- * an inconsistent context submission status then
- * back out of the previously requested reset and
- * retry later.
- */
- WARN(inconsistent,
- "Inconsistent context status on %s: %u\n",
- engine->name, status);
+ /*
+ * Get a hold of the currently executing context.
+ *
+ * Context submission status consistency is done implicitly so
+ * we might as well check it post-engine disablement since we
+ * get that option for free. Also, it's conceivable that the
+ * context submission state might have changed as part of the
+ * reset request on gen8+ so it's not completely devoid of
+ * value to do this.
+ */
+ if (!i915_gem_reset_engine_CSSC_precheck(dev_priv,
+ engine,
+ ¤t_request,
+ &ret)) {
+ DRM_INFO("Aborting hang recovery on %s (%d)\n",
+ engine->name, ret);
- ret = -EAGAIN;
goto reenable_reset_engine_error;
- }
+ }
}
/* Sample the current ring head position */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index f35a9b0..71208de 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
#include "i915_drv.h"
#include "i915_trace.h"
#include "intel_drv.h"
+#include "intel_lrc_tdr.h"
/**
* DOC: interrupt handling
@@ -1302,7 +1303,7 @@ static irqreturn_t gen8_gt_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
if (tmp & (GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << GEN8_RCS_IRQ_SHIFT))
- intel_lrc_irq_handler(&dev_priv->ring[RCS]);
+ intel_lrc_irq_handler(&dev_priv->ring[RCS], true);
if (tmp & (GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT << GEN8_RCS_IRQ_SHIFT))
notify_ring(&dev_priv->ring[RCS]);
if (tmp & (GT_GEN8_RCS_WATCHDOG_INTERRUPT << GEN8_RCS_IRQ_SHIFT)) {
@@ -1319,7 +1320,7 @@ static irqreturn_t gen8_gt_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
}
if (tmp & (GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << GEN8_BCS_IRQ_SHIFT))
- intel_lrc_irq_handler(&dev_priv->ring[BCS]);
+ intel_lrc_irq_handler(&dev_priv->ring[BCS], true);
if (tmp & (GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT << GEN8_BCS_IRQ_SHIFT))
notify_ring(&dev_priv->ring[BCS]);
} else
@@ -1333,7 +1334,7 @@ static irqreturn_t gen8_gt_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
if (tmp & (GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << GEN8_VCS1_IRQ_SHIFT))
- intel_lrc_irq_handler(&dev_priv->ring[VCS]);
+ intel_lrc_irq_handler(&dev_priv->ring[VCS], true);
if (tmp & (GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT << GEN8_VCS1_IRQ_SHIFT))
notify_ring(&dev_priv->ring[VCS]);
if (tmp & (GT_GEN8_VCS_WATCHDOG_INTERRUPT << GEN8_VCS1_IRQ_SHIFT)) {
@@ -1350,7 +1351,7 @@ static irqreturn_t gen8_gt_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
}
if (tmp & (GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << GEN8_VCS2_IRQ_SHIFT))
- intel_lrc_irq_handler(&dev_priv->ring[VCS2]);
+ intel_lrc_irq_handler(&dev_priv->ring[VCS2], true);
if (tmp & (GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT << GEN8_VCS2_IRQ_SHIFT))
notify_ring(&dev_priv->ring[VCS2]);
if (tmp & (GT_GEN8_VCS_WATCHDOG_INTERRUPT << GEN8_VCS2_IRQ_SHIFT)) {
@@ -1376,7 +1377,7 @@ static irqreturn_t gen8_gt_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
if (tmp & (GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << GEN8_VECS_IRQ_SHIFT))
- intel_lrc_irq_handler(&dev_priv->ring[VECS]);
+ intel_lrc_irq_handler(&dev_priv->ring[VECS], true);
if (tmp & (GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT << GEN8_VECS_IRQ_SHIFT))
notify_ring(&dev_priv->ring[VECS]);
} else
@@ -2476,27 +2477,6 @@ static void i915_error_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
ret = i915_reset_engine(ring);
- /*
- * Execlist mode only:
- *
- * -EAGAIN means that between detecting a hang (and
- * also determining that the currently submitted
- * context is stable and valid) and trying to recover
- * from the hang the current context changed state.
- * This means that we are probably not completely hung
- * after all. Just fail and retry by exiting all the
- * way back and wait for the next hang detection. If we
- * have a true hang on our hands then we will detect it
- * again, otherwise we will continue like nothing
- * happened.
- */
- if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
- DRM_ERROR("Reset of %s aborted due to " \
- "change in context submission " \
- "state - retrying!", ring->name);
- ret = 0;
- }
-
if (ret) {
DRM_ERROR("Reset of %s failed! (%d)", ring->name, ret);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 9d01fc3..b48f74c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -702,11 +702,15 @@ static bool execlists_check_remove_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
/**
* intel_lrc_irq_handler() - handle Context Switch interrupts
* @ring: Engine Command Streamer to handle.
+ * @do_lock: Lock execlist spinlock (if false the caller is responsible for this)
*
* Check the unread Context Status Buffers and manage the submission of new
* contexts to the ELSP accordingly.
+ *
+ * Return:
+ * The number of unqueued contexts.
*/
-void intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
+int intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, bool do_lock)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private;
u32 status_pointer;
@@ -716,6 +720,9 @@ void intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
u32 status_id;
u32 submit_contexts = 0;
+ if (do_lock)
+ spin_lock(&ring->execlist_lock);
+
status_pointer = I915_READ(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_PTR(ring));
read_pointer = ring->next_context_status_buffer;
@@ -723,8 +730,6 @@ void intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
if (read_pointer > write_pointer)
write_pointer += GEN8_CSB_ENTRIES;
- spin_lock(&ring->execlist_lock);
-
while (read_pointer < write_pointer) {
read_pointer++;
status = I915_READ(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_BUF_LO(ring, read_pointer % GEN8_CSB_ENTRIES));
@@ -757,8 +762,6 @@ void intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
execlists_context_unqueue(ring, false);
}
- spin_unlock(&ring->execlist_lock);
-
WARN(submit_contexts > 2, "More than two context complete events?\n");
ring->next_context_status_buffer = write_pointer % GEN8_CSB_ENTRIES;
@@ -766,6 +769,11 @@ void intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
_MASKED_FIELD(GEN8_CSB_PTR_MASK << 8,
((u32)ring->next_context_status_buffer &
GEN8_CSB_PTR_MASK) << 8));
+
+ if (do_lock)
+ spin_unlock(&ring->execlist_lock);
+
+ return submit_contexts;
}
static int execlists_context_queue(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
@@ -1770,6 +1778,7 @@ static int gen8_init_common_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev;
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
u8 next_context_status_buffer_hw;
+ unsigned long flags;
lrc_setup_hardware_status_page(ring,
ring->default_context->engine[ring->id].state);
@@ -1788,6 +1797,7 @@ static int gen8_init_common_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
_MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(GFX_RUN_LIST_ENABLE));
POSTING_READ(RING_MODE_GEN7(ring));
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ring->execlist_lock, flags);
/*
* Instead of resetting the Context Status Buffer (CSB) read pointer to
* zero, we need to read the write pointer from hardware and use its
@@ -1810,6 +1820,8 @@ static int gen8_init_common_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
next_context_status_buffer_hw = (GEN8_CSB_ENTRIES - 1);
ring->next_context_status_buffer = next_context_status_buffer_hw;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ring->execlist_lock, flags);
+
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Execlists enabled for %s\n", ring->name);
i915_hangcheck_reinit(ring);
@@ -3192,3 +3204,64 @@ intel_execlists_TDR_get_current_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
return status;
}
+
+/**
+ * execlists_TDR_force_CSB_check() - rectify inconsistency by faking IRQ
+ * @dev_priv: ...
+ * @engine: engine whose CSB is to be checked.
+ *
+ * Context submission status inconsistencies are caused by lost interrupts that
+ * leave CSB events unprocessed and leave contexts in the execlist queues when
+ * they should really have been removed. These stale contexts block further
+ * submissions to the hardware (all the while the hardware is sitting idle) and
+ * thereby cause a software hang. The way to rectify this is by manually
+ * checking the CSB buffer for outstanding context state transition events and
+ * acting on these. The easiest way of doing this is by simply faking the
+ * presumed lost context event interrupt by manually calling the interrupt
+ * handler. If there are indeed outstanding, unprocessed CSB events then these
+ * will be processed by the faked interrupt call and if one of these events is
+ * some form of context completion event then that will purge a stale context
+ * from the execlist queue and submit a new context to hardware from the queue,
+ * thereby resuming execution.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * True: Forced CSB check successful, state consistency restored.
+ * False: No CSB events found, forced CSB check unsuccessful, failed
+ * trying to restore consistency.
+ */
+bool intel_execlists_TDR_force_CSB_check(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ bool hw_active;
+ int was_effective;
+
+ hw_active =
+ (I915_READ(RING_EXECLIST_STATUS_LO(engine)) &
+ EXECLIST_STATUS_CURRENT_ACTIVE_ELEMENT_STATUS) ?
+ true : false;
+ if (hw_active) {
+ u32 hw_context;
+
+ hw_context = I915_READ(RING_EXECLIST_STATUS_CTX_ID(engine));
+ WARN(hw_active, "Context (%x) executing on %s - " \
+ "No need for faked IRQ!\n",
+ hw_context, engine->name);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->execlist_lock, flags);
+
+ WARN(1, "%s: Inconsistent context state - Faking context event IRQ!\n",
+ engine->name);
+
+ if (!(was_effective = intel_lrc_irq_handler(engine, false)))
+ DRM_ERROR("Forced CSB check of %s ineffective!\n", engine->name);
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->execlist_lock, flags);
+
+ wake_up_all(&engine->irq_queue);
+
+ return !!was_effective;
+}
+
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
index 593f5e7..ffb4159 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ int intel_execlists_submission(struct i915_execbuffer_params *params,
struct list_head *vmas);
u32 intel_execlists_ctx_id(struct drm_i915_gem_object *ctx_obj);
-void intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *ring);
+int intel_lrc_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, bool do_lock);
void intel_execlists_retire_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *ring);
int intel_execlists_read_tail(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc_tdr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc_tdr.h
index 4520753..041c808 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc_tdr.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc_tdr.h
@@ -32,5 +32,8 @@ enum context_submission_status
intel_execlists_TDR_get_current_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
struct drm_i915_gem_request **req);
+bool intel_execlists_TDR_force_CSB_check(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
+
#endif /* _INTEL_LRC_TDR_H_ */
--
1.9.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list